[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#199631: marked as done (RFP: cjet -- LaserJet PCL emulation for Canon CaPSL III printers)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:02:08 -0400
with message-id <E19b9iC-0004nG-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#199631: fixed in cjet 0.8.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2003 19:28:57 +0000
>From jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk Fri Apr 11 14:28:54 2003
Return-path: <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>
Received: from smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net [212.135.6.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1944Ck-00030i-00; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:28:54 -0500
Received: from tnt-25-121.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.234.121] helo=nestie.pigeonloft)
	by smarthost0.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 1944Cj-000FOy-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:28:53 +0100
Received: from pigeon.pigeonloft ([192.168.1.1] ident=mail)
	by nestie.pigeonloft with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1943d9-0003xY-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:52:07 +0100
Received: from pigeon by pigeon.pigeonloft with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1943Zj-00014P-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:48:35 +0100
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:48:35 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: cupsomatic-ppd "Canon LBP-4U, Foomatic + cjet" driver requires cjet executable which isn't in Debian
Message-ID: <20030411184835.GU444@pigeon.pigeonloft>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: cupsomatic-ppd
Version: 0.20010420-4

The "Canon LBP-4U, Foomatic + cjet" driver for the Canon LBP4 laser
printer requires an executable "cjet" which does not appear to be in
Debian.

Doing a search package contents on the Debian website revealed that
apsfilter contains a file called cjet, which is NOT the file required
by the above driver. No other instances of "cjet" were found.

I was able to download the cjet source from the following URL:

  http:/www.ipd.bth.se/ska/sim_home/filer/cjet-0.89.src.tar.gz

Having compiled this and installed the executable in /usr/local/bin, I
then edited the .ppd file generated in /etc/cups/ppd as follows:

Old:

*% COMDATA #  'cmd' => 'gs -q -dBATCH -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=ljet3%A%Z -sOutputFile=- - | cjet -q%C',

New:

*% COMDATA #  'cmd' => 'gs -q -dBATCH -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -sDEVICE=ljet3%A%Z -sOutputFile=- - | /usr/local/bin/cjet -q%C',

(This line seems only to be in the .ppd file installed in
/etc/cups/ppd; it's not in /usr/share/cups/model/Canon/LBP-4U-cjet.ppd)

The driver now works.

Pigeon

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 199631-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2003 02:04:41 +0000
>From rdonald@auric.debian.org Fri Jul 11 21:04:41 2003
Return-path: <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19b9kf-0000Yy-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 21:04:41 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19b9iC-0004nG-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:02:08 -0400
From: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
To: 199631-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.23 $
Subject: Bug#199631: fixed in cjet 0.8.9-1
Message-Id: <E19b9iC-0004nG-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:02:08 -0400
Delivered-To: 199631-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cjet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cjet_0.8.9-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cjet/cjet_0.8.9-1.diff.gz
cjet_0.8.9-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cjet/cjet_0.8.9-1.dsc
cjet_0.8.9-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cjet/cjet_0.8.9-1_i386.deb
cjet_0.8.9.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cjet/cjet_0.8.9.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 199631@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org> (supplier of updated cjet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  2 Jul 2003 10:11:13 -0500
Source: cjet
Binary: cjet
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.8.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
Description: 
 cjet       - Software PCL emulation for Canon CaPSL laser printers
Closes: 199631
Changes: 
 cjet (0.8.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release.  (Closes: #199631)
Files: 
 30f99fb3afb753429da4fabeed9b7b6a 844 text extra cjet_0.8.9-1.dsc
 d80e83d47b79b03028a00b72ac27e3de 50427 text extra cjet_0.8.9.orig.tar.gz
 ade1f560c4eeb84b571f3cb3bb520f8c 2892 text extra cjet_0.8.9-1.diff.gz
 3c6f390a36ff74d4c2ebd16d05ab083e 21600 text extra cjet_0.8.9-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iQEXAwUBPwThRlxpg5e5AmZiFAJjfQP9FD6YX8RJWmQi00V8IT2qlKnaOuONR3OP
RWG2tpRdm1Coqm47jdKJLV7S+8dxpenj+ou7qvQ/OzbXEMVmKseqZwJnG/AUxhXy
lJgDwJ0s6DVS0PGwDKV0gm3yynspAaoeTMtNHYiHuBSWXoqiZyzb2TCzERCblXYJ
Ov+kZhMKMEAEAJMBlXlPvW6NxjIPhm6Pyv4oHWzmTTCPwGOR4Ozj/DBNqGnB+Y02
4B3OWItWSSmvs8pqShK4nR1HXdK2M/P+7Ohsj8Jn0Z0n3nIvTyFVGmltOnsOZo19
+/CPxnRCZECu+RN9blbS059wTw9o6m68NArUxJglc1uSL0COWK37/+PR
=0on6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: