Bug#199213: marked as done (RFP: perlapi-5.6.1 -- PACKAGE perlapi-5.6.1 NOW MISSING IN SARGE)
Your message dated Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:59:56 +0100
with message-id <20030629125956.GA7616@doc.ic.ac.uk>
and subject line Bug#199213: RFP: perlapi-5.6.1 -- PACKAGE perlapi-5.6.1 NOW MISSING IN SARGE
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2003 03:31:44 +0000
>From hedges@linuxdelivery.com Sat Jun 28 22:31:43 2003
Return-path: <hedges@linuxdelivery.com>
Received: from grouse.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.116]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19WSul-0003nT-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 22:31:43 -0500
Received: from user-119bqa4.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.233.68] helo=nutter.linuxdelivery.com)
by grouse.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19WSul-0005J9-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:31:43 -0700
Received: from hedges by nutter.linuxdelivery.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19WSuk-0000Cz-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:31:42 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mark Hedges <hedges@recyclecomputer.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: perlapi-5.6.1 -- PACKAGE perlapi-5.6.1 NOW MISSING IN SARGE
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:31:42 -0700
Message-Id: <[🔎] E19WSuk-0000Cz-00@nutter.linuxdelivery.com>
Sender: Mark Hedges <hedges@linuxdelivery.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : perlapi-5.6.1
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name <somebody@some.org>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Description : PACKAGE perlapi-5.6.1 NOW MISSING IN SARGE
(Include the long description here.)
perlapi-5.6.1 is a package that disappeared from the sarge
distribution after rollout of perl 5.8.0 and needs to be
re-created. Various packages like apt-file depend on it
indirectly, and apt-get refuses to install them. Bug reports
have been marked resolved, but they are not resolved. This
needs to be a dummy package pointing to the components of
perl 5.8.0 that satisfy the dependencies, or it just needs
to be reinstated in the interest of backwards compatibility.
--mark--
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nutter.linuxdelivery.com 2.4.20 #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 17:48:13 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 199213-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2003 12:59:59 +0000
>From aps100@doc.ic.ac.uk Sun Jun 29 07:59:58 2003
Return-path: <aps100@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Received: from public1-sout4-4-cust60.sout.broadband.ntl.com (cyclone) [81.103.170.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Wbmf-0003uW-00; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 07:59:58 -0500
Received: from asuffield by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19Wbme-00020d-00
for <199213-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:59:56 +0100
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 13:59:56 +0100
From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
To: 199213-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#199213: RFP: perlapi-5.6.1 -- PACKAGE perlapi-5.6.1 NOW MISSING IN SARGE
Message-ID: <20030629125956.GA7616@doc.ic.ac.uk>
References: <[🔎] E19WSuk-0000Cz-00@nutter.linuxdelivery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E19WSuk-0000Cz-00@nutter.linuxdelivery.com>
X-Monty-Python: No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Suffield <aps100@doc.ic.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: 199213-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-26.1 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,
QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 08:31:42PM -0700, Mark Hedges wrote:
> perlapi-5.6.1 is a package that disappeared from the sarge=20
> distribution after rollout of perl 5.8.0 and needs to be
> re-created. Various packages like apt-file depend on it
> indirectly, and apt-get refuses to install them. Bug reports
> have been marked resolved, but they are not resolved. This
> needs to be a dummy package pointing to the components of
> perl 5.8.0 that satisfy the dependencies, or it just needs
> to be reinstated in the interest of backwards compatibility.
Kindly do not interfere in things you do not understand. This is
deliberate. Packages depending on perlapi-5.6.1 need to be rebuilt
against perl 5.8.
--=20
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+/uLMlpK98RSteX8RAkHCAKCINdVLwodbJ8RyCVvFIdmtDr296wCdEx/E
dVwFK7JGE3gMDO7k+vF1Mjg=
=YgFG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--
Reply to: