Bug#184552: marked as done (ITA: jade -- James Clark's DSSSL Engine)
Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400
with message-id <E19Gcz2-0003CY-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#184552: fixed in jade 1.2.1-30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2003 01:54:17 +0000
>From stephen@cos.agilent.com Wed Mar 12 19:54:15 2003
Return-path: <stephen@cos.agilent.com>
Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com [192.25.240.36]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18tHvC-0003F9-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:54:14 -0600
Received: from relcos2.cos.agilent.com (relcos2.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.237])
by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 238C717D5F; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:14 -0700 (MST)
Received: from smmihn08.cos.agilent.com (smmihn08.cos.agilent.com [130.29.42.9])
by relcos2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9B06535B; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:13 -0700 (MST)
Received: by smmihn08.cos.agilent.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CF7242E887F; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:12 -0700 (MST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen M Moraco <stephen@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: jade -- James Clark's DSSSL Engine
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:54:12 -0700
Message-Id: <20030313015412.CF7242E887F@smmihn08.cos.agilent.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: 1.2.1-28; reported 2003-03-12
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the jade package. It is replaced by openjade.
The package description is:
Jade is an implementation of the DSSSL style language.
.
The jade engine is a useful tool (in conjunction with a DSSSL style
sheet) for translating SGML documents into other formats. Jade can
currently generate SGML, RTF, and TeX. In conjunction with the "jadetex"
TeX style, it can generate quite nice output.
.
Author: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Homepage: http://www.jclark.com/jade/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux smmihn08 2.4.17 #1 Sat Jan 26 22:13:28 MST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184552-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 May 2003 11:08:03 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Fri May 16 06:08:03 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19Gd4F-0001RW-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 06:08:03 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19Gcz2-0003CY-00; Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400
From: Neil Roeth <neil@debian.org>
To: 184552-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#184552: fixed in jade 1.2.1-30
Message-Id: <E19Gcz2-0003CY-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 07:02:40 -0400
Delivered-To: 184552-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jade, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
jade_1.2.1-30.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30.diff.gz
jade_1.2.1-30.dsc
to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30.dsc
jade_1.2.1-30_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/jade/jade_1.2.1-30_i386.deb
libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/jade/libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/jade/libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/jade/sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 184552@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Neil Roeth <neil@debian.org> (supplier of updated jade package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 18:24:20 -0400
Source: jade
Binary: jade libsp1 sp libsp1-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.1-30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Neil Roeth <neil@debian.org>
Changed-By: Neil Roeth <neil@debian.org>
Description:
jade - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
libsp1 - Runtime library for James Clark's SP suite
libsp1-dev - James Clark's SP suite, developer support
sp - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
Closes: 178312 184552 191886
Changes:
jade (1.2.1-30) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (closes: #184552)
* Depend on 1.3.4-1.2.1-30 shlibs (closes: #191886)
* Built with g++ 3.2 (closes: #178312)
Files:
7b7ba0cf1a7806f16d53b2a352a336e6 653 text optional jade_1.2.1-30.dsc
bb7d4a6f7e0ccaa2d0af31643a786bcf 224957 text optional jade_1.2.1-30.diff.gz
d9b27c3a280fa8322b1c5b5a01fa27a4 159994 text optional sp_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
05a705d821058b87f9041c07f64f26e8 1290802 libs optional libsp1_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
2f35e37344561d6d98f64d94c7ba4b2f 1646218 devel optional libsp1-dev_1.3.4-1.2.1-30_i386.deb
c7113f90ba894301abe0410cf8e66d46 287636 text optional jade_1.2.1-30_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+xE5H6j+skPrutKkRAkyiAJ9oN9TTGTWVLIRF+x8j1dig10ZapwCfafB7
ic4irkaIEFU+42erBFWahnE=
=cYY9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: