[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#190402: marked as done (ITP: gimp-dimage-color -- GIMP plugin to convert Minolta DiMAGE pictures to sRGB colorspace)



Your message dated Tue, 13 May 2003 00:20:22 -0400
with message-id <E19FRH4-0006WU-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#190402: fixed in gimp-dimage-color 1.1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Apr 2003 22:31:13 +0000
>From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Wed Apr 23 17:31:13 2003
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from mta06-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.46] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 198Slk-0003mm-00; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:31:12 -0500
Received: from shiri.gloaming.local ([80.6.171.171])
          by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
          id <20030423223108.CFHM12018.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@shiri.gloaming.local>
          for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:31:08 +0100
Received: from james by shiri.gloaming.local with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 198Slg-0006XX-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:31:08 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: gimp-dimage-color -- GIMP plugin to convert Minolta DiMAGE
 pictures to sRGB colorspace
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:31:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87sms87snn.fsf@shiri.gloaming.local>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/20.7 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.3 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	autolearn=ham version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: gimp-dimage-color
  Version: 1.1.0
  Upstream Author: Laurent HOUDARD
  URL: http://dimage-color.sourceforge.net/
  License: GPL
  Descripton: GIMP plugin to convert Minolta DiMAGE pictures to sRGB colorspace

The GIMP Dimage color plugin converts images produced by the Minolta
DiMAGE digital cameras into sRGB colorspace. The camera produces
images in a wider gamut colorspace so that pictures look "washed out"
when viewed on a monitor without a conversion.

It enables Linux users to do the same conversions as they can with the
Minolta Dimage Viewer Utility.

-- 
James

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190402-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 04:23:32 +0000
>From rdonald@auric.debian.org Mon May 12 23:23:32 2003
Return-path: <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 19FRK7-0007Z2-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 23:23:31 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19FRH4-0006WU-00; Tue, 13 May 2003 00:20:22 -0400
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
To: 190402-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.23 $
Subject: Bug#190402: fixed in gimp-dimage-color 1.1.0-1
Message-Id: <E19FRH4-0006WU-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 00:20:22 -0400
Delivered-To: 190402-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gimp-dimage-color, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gimp-dimage-color/gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.diff.gz
gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gimp-dimage-color/gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.dsc
gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gimp-dimage-color/gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1_i386.deb
gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/gimp-dimage-color/gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 190402@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Troup <james@nocrew.org> (supplier of updated gimp-dimage-color package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 03:11:00 +0100
Source: gimp-dimage-color
Binary: gimp-dimage-color
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Changed-By: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Description: 
 gimp-dimage-color - GIMP plugin to convert Minolta DiMAGE pictures to sRGB colorspace
Closes: 190402
Changes: 
 gimp-dimage-color (1.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release.  Closes: #190402
Files: 
 d1390d82955a99fd512286d994a51a41 610 graphics extra gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.dsc
 0f5476a3878b6366d9332640c2ee6351 79685 graphics extra gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz
 68534e26c8945817c8d9bdedf69f6e3d 2027 graphics extra gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1.diff.gz
 8a12b88b8c39fa8e1873345e13633f73 18730 graphics extra gimp-dimage-color_1.1.0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAj6olb4ACgkQgD/uEicUG7A6PACfd7H0oWJaBDd3z2uDlbOpXtdE
nngAoKDwHU4gpQonRU8vbY2wGh9yOp6C
=AfOg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: