Bug#180014: marked as done (ITA: gdm - GNOME Display Manager)
Your message dated Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:28 -0800
with message-id <20030206220428.GA1610@cyberhqz.com>
and subject line intent to hijack
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 15:18:56 +0000
>From ari@ebnj.net Thu Feb 06 09:18:56 2003
Return-path: <ari@ebnj.net>
Received: from mail.alienhosting.com [66.216.78.56]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18gnng-0005F8-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 09:18:52 -0600
Received: (qmail 24254 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2003 15:18:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO obiwan) (155.33.236.213)
by mail.alienhosting.com with SMTP; 6 Feb 2003 15:18:49 -0000
Received: from ari by obiwan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18gnn8-0001FU-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 10:18:18 -0500
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:18:18 -0500
From: Ari Pollak <ari@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: gdm - GNOME Display Manager
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20030206151816.GA4152@obiwan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: Linux obiwan 2.4.21-pre4
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: Ari Pollak <ari@obiwan>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable;
Severity: normal
* Package name : gdm
Version : 2.4.1.3
Upstream Author : Martin K. Petersen <mkp@mkp.net>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gdm
* License : GPL
Description : GNOME Display Manager (for Gnome2)
This is basically the same gdm package based on Ryan Murray & Colin
Walters' packaging, but the latest version which integrates with GNOME2.
I won't be uploading anything for at least a week and a half so I can
get input from people who would know better than I as to whether this
should even be uploaded - Ryan has said that he won't replace gdm with a
newer version because GNOME2 doesn't run on all architectures yet, but
the people who can run GNOME2 shouldn't be penalized with a GNOME1
version of gdm.
Tentative packages are located at
http://people.debian.org/~ari/unstable/.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 180014-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 22:04:30 +0000
>From rmurray@cyberhqz.com Thu Feb 06 16:04:30 2003
Return-path: <rmurray@cyberhqz.com>
Received: from h24-77-96-253.sbm.shawcable.net (straylight.cyberhqz.com) [24.77.96.253] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18gu8D-0006bl-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 16:04:30 -0600
Received: from cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com [192.168.0.2])
by straylight.cyberhqz.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFB554038
for <180014-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by cyberhq.internal.cyberhqz.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F0A7F1B96AB; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:28 -0800
From: Ryan Murray <rmurray@debian.org>
To: 180014-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: intent to hijack
Message-ID: <20030206220428.GA1610@cyberhqz.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: 180014-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Apparently I'm the only one who gives a rat's ass about what happens to oth=
er
ports, but hey. Maybe it would be better if we just deleted everything oth=
er
than i386, since only a handful of developers seem to care about all the
other archs, and only slightly more care for more than just i386, because
they actually have another arch or two.
I didn't realize new versions gave a reason to hijack. There are
several other packages that people hold off on uploading the latest
and greatest for some time after it comes out, for various reasons.=20
You could be helpful towards this by helping to fix FTBFS bugs in
gnome packages. You can be unhelpful by hijacking and forking existing
packages.
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+QtvsN2Dbz/1mRasRApIEAKD3pC1lkSuWsfaaBdxfnieP4SScBQCg5zSn
N3Zu4WsNRxgqNCgrP5+4Jt8=
=BzDS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
Reply to: