[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#171097: marked as done (ITP: cryptplug -- Collection of plugins to crytographic engines.)



Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2002 00:06:40 -0500
with message-id <E18PyK0-0002d5-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#171097: fixed in cryptplug 0.3.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2002 21:06:02 +0000
>From jose@jaimedelamo.eu.org Thu Nov 28 15:06:01 2002
Return-path: <jose@jaimedelamo.eu.org>
Received: from 213-96-125-217.uc.nombres.ttd.es (matrix.jaimedelamo.eu.org) [213.96.125.217] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18HVrF-0000jE-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:06:01 -0600
Received: from jose by matrix.jaimedelamo.eu.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18HVrB-0007F7-00; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:05:57 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: cryptplug -- Collection of plugins to crytographic engines.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 22:05:57 +0100
Message-Id: <E18HVrB-0007F7-00@matrix.jaimedelamo.eu.org>
Sender: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jose@jaimedelamo.eu.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-28
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : cryptplug
  Version         : 
  Upstream Author : 
  	Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB
	   - Design and implementation.
	g10 Code GmbH <code@g10code.com>
	    - Packaging and bug fixes.
    
* URL             : http://www.gnupg.org/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Collection of plugins to crytographic engines.

 A collection of plug-ins to cryptographic engines, accessible
 by the crypt-plug interface.  Applications can make use of the crypto
 operations provided by the CryptPlug interface, and the plug-ins
 provided by this package implement the interface for various
 cryptographic engines, like GnuPG.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux matrix 2.4.19 #1 jue oct 10 18:41:18 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171097-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2002 05:08:02 +0000
>From rdonald@auric.debian.org Sat Dec 21 23:08:02 2002
Return-path: <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18PyLK-0000QX-00; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:08:02 -0600
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 18PyK0-0002d5-00; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 00:06:40 -0500
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
To: 171097-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.20 $
Subject: Bug#171097: fixed in cryptplug 0.3.15-1
Message-Id: <E18PyK0-0002d5-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 00:06:40 -0500
Delivered-To: 171097-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cryptplug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cryptplug-dev_0.3.15-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cryptplug/cryptplug-dev_0.3.15-1_i386.deb
cryptplug_0.3.15-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cryptplug/cryptplug_0.3.15-1.diff.gz
cryptplug_0.3.15-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cryptplug/cryptplug_0.3.15-1.dsc
cryptplug_0.3.15-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cryptplug/cryptplug_0.3.15-1_i386.deb
cryptplug_0.3.15.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cryptplug/cryptplug_0.3.15.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 171097@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org> (supplier of updated cryptplug package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  4 Dec 2002 22:29:48 +0100
Source: cryptplug
Binary: cryptplug-dev cryptplug
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.15-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Description: 
 cryptplug  - Collection of plugins to crytographic engines
 cryptplug-dev - Collection of plugins to crytographic engines
Closes: 163242 171097
Changes: 
 cryptplug (0.3.15-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release. (Closes: #171097, #163242)
Files: 
 aba1e69449b1fe645711de9d1aa6f2e4 610 - optional cryptplug_0.3.15-1.dsc
 2cbb9ef9a76f3619610c0abf12aba485 218464 - optional cryptplug_0.3.15.orig.tar.gz
 ff4c676ce817037990c382dc692387c5 2652 - optional cryptplug_0.3.15-1.diff.gz
 a9de25e82fda12429975ae01ca5d6fd7 77106 devel optional cryptplug-dev_0.3.15-1_i386.deb
 005b5470ffaacaf2338c02ba49437979 35640 libs optional cryptplug_0.3.15-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9/GkBS+BYJZB4jhERAkz5AJ0cmTCY+HZJagkSMGVnTJJ94vlAgwCgrPje
TTHQKSwTm2L2xlxXwNoPurM=
=nzqJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: