On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:14:38PM +0100, Adam Byrtek wrote: > I was quite used to nc in my dos times, so mc is the main tool I use > on my Debian system. Therefore I'm a bit worried that mc in Debian is > in a really bad state: I now really a little of the ongoing mc development, but anyway I'm wondering why you are going to create a new mc package. Ok, an mc-snapshot package could be useful if upstream doesn't release very often, but have you thought about helping the mc maintainer in packaging new versions of the mc package? I mean, it seems silly to me having an mc-snapshot package and an 'official' mc package that is ancient wrt current mc release. My 0.02 Eur Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgprOa2LxcOaE.pgp
Description: PGP signature