On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:01:20PM +0100, Stephan Kaufhold wrote:
> i'm a new maintainer and intent to adop the ifenslave package
> Is this OK for you? Please let me know.
Is there any reason you want to adopt ifenslave instead of another
package? This is a package with a problem: it needs kernel header files
but it's rather problematic in Debian to depend on kernel-header
packages and get it to build flawlessly by all the build-daemons.
Recently I just removed the dependencies on kernel headers and included
the various needed definitions in the source of infenslave itself
(however that was only possible because the definitions where the same
for all architectures). So now it builds without problems, so I
should've closed the RFA. But if you have a strong interest in this
particular package you can adopt it, however if not I'd suggest you help
out elsewhere.
--
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
Attachment:
pgpwhoPfXucB_.pgp
Description: PGP signature