Bug#160394: marked as done (ITP: rfb -- Remotely control a user's X desktop)
Your message dated Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:11:13 +0200
with message-id <20021022051113.GB15520@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
and subject line rfb is in sid now.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Sep 2002 18:49:12 +0000
>From d92-jwa@nada.kth.se Tue Sep 10 13:49:12 2002
Return-path: <d92-jwa@nada.kth.se>
Received: from h113n2fls35o826.telia.com (foo) [217.211.57.113] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17oq4V-0007ub-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 13:49:11 -0500
Received: from johan by foo with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17oq4P-0000Ps-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:49:05 +0200
From: Johan Walles <d92-jwa@nada.kth.se>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: x0rfbserver -- Remotely control a user's X desktop
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 20:49:05 +0200
Message-Id: <E17oq4P-0000Ps-00@foo>
Sender: Johan Walles <johan@localhost.localdomain>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-10
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : x0rfbserver
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Jens Wagner <jwagner@hexonet.de>
* URL : http://www.hexonet.de/software/x0rfbserver/index.html
* License : GPL
Description : Remotely control a user's X desktop
>From the web page:
x0rfbserver is a software application that is able to export an X desktop to
another machine. It exports the framebuffer of the X server to one or more
clients using strong compression and injects keyboard and mouse inputs from the
clients into the server. The protocol used is the well documented RFB 3.3
protocol, so x0rfbserver should be compatible with every client speaking that
protocol too, e.g. it should work together with the vnc viewers of AT&T.
x0rfbserver provides a complete remote control of the desktop on the computer it
is running on.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux foo 2.4.17 #1 sön feb 10 09:40:14 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=sv_SE.ISO8859-1, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO8859-1
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 160394-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2002 05:11:15 +0000
>From ola@opal.dhs.org Tue Oct 22 00:11:15 2002
Return-path: <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Received: from p242.linnet.nu (chrystal.opal.dhs.org) [62.13.47.242]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 183rJy-0004E9-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:11:15 -0500
Received: from ola by chrystal.opal.dhs.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 183rJx-0004qR-00
for <160394-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:11:13 +0200
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 07:11:13 +0200
From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
To: 160394-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: rfb is in sid now.
Message-ID: <20021022051113.GB15520@chrystal.opal.dhs.org>
Reply-To: opal@debian.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Ola Lundqvist <ola@opal.dhs.org>
Delivered-To: 160394-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Thanks.
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: