[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#115609: Razorback packaging status (09 Oct 2002)



Razorback package in progress.
So don't think about filing an Intent to Hijack yet = P

Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau

----- Forwarded message from Leigh Purdie <Leigh.Purdie@intersectalliance.com> -----

Subject: Re: Packaging problems with Razorback for Debian GNU/Linux
From: Leigh Purdie <Leigh.Purdie@intersectalliance.com>
To: Andrew Lau <netsnipe@debianplanet.org>
Cc: George Cora <George.Cora@intersectalliance.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.42
X-Spam-Level: 

G'day Andrew,

Back in Canberra again. :)

Thanks for the log file excerpts - very handy. Looks like Marty @
snort.org has changed the default log format on me again :)

1.8 used a event-in-1-line log format, whereas the latest version looks
like it splits log entries over multiple lines. Shouldn't be too hard
for me to fix this little problem, but it might be thursday or friday
before I can have a good look at it - is this OK time-wise? We're
currently working on SNARE-like functionality for Solaris and Winsdoze,
so my Tuesday / Wednesday is going to be pretty full.

BTW: Happy to include the Makefile mods (razorback and Snare) in the
core download too - might make the package maintenance process a heck of
a lot simpler - even if my primary machine isn't currently Debian
(though it has been in the past, and probably will be in the future) ;)

Regards,

Leigh.

On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 12:38, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hi Leigh,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 07:51:35AM +1000,
> Leigh.Purdie@intersectalliance.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks for replying so soon.
> 
> > I have a box running potato, so we should be able to fix this pretty
> > quickly. :)
> 
> You're going to need the now stable Debian 3.0 (Woody) at least due to
> GNOME 1.4 dependencies and SNORT 1.8.
> 
> > BTW: Any idea if someone has picked up the 'snare' ITP yet?
> 
> 	Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena <jfs@dat.etsit.upm.es> filed it
> on 18 Dec 2001:
> <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=125657&repeatmerged=yes>
> and since the he has taken so long, it's quite acceptable to the
> Debian community to file a 'Intent to Hijack' as we call it! = )
> Shouldn't be too hard once I get Razorback under my belt and the fact
> I can reached by a local phone call in cause of security
> vulnerabilities.  
> 	I've been working on the snare packages in my spare time, but
> I'm going to have to rewrite some Makefiles for the kernel module to
> fit in with Debian's make-kpkg scripts.
> 
> Yours sincerely,
> Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
> 
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau                   Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW *
> *   "apt-get into it"                        Debian GNU/Linux Packager    *
> *     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
> * GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
Leigh Purdie, Director - InterSect Alliance Pty Ltd
http://www.intersectalliance.com/


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau                   Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW *
*   "apt-get into it"                        Debian GNU/Linux Packager    *
*     <netsnipe(+)debianplanet.org\0>      <alau(+)cse.unsw.edu.au\0>     *
* GnuPG 1024D/2E8B68BD 0B77 73D0 4F3B F286 63F1  9F4A 9B24 C07D 2E8B 68BD *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpegwdTZ8WGq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: