Bug#120209: Debian ROX-Filer packages

[Jan Wagemakers <janw@easynet.be>]

Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin@amiga.pl> schreef:

>   With 1.3.3 release I packaged this release also but not said much
> about it - now I'm thinking about making it just simple, plain ROX-Filer
> with only minimum of patches applied (only those which Debianish it) -
> but I will wait to 1.3.4 release with it.
> 
>   But let's go to conclusion:
> 
>   I'm not Debian developer (yet - maybe some day I'll start applying to
> be) so my packages are 'unofficial', non-Debian.  Maybe some day they
> will be 'official' on ROX HomePage (I talked about it with Jan some days
> ago).
> 
>   Second thing is - what part of ROX-Filer functionality which I removed
> in my package you want to have in it:
> 
>   - using Appicon.xpm as DirIcon if there is no .DirIcon
>   - starting dir/AppRun just by click on dir folder icon
>   
> And one more thing: Are you using ROX-Filer? And if yes - which 
> packages :))

Although I really like the work that you have done, I am still using my own
packages. One reason is that the AppDir isn't working anymore in your
packages. Not that I really like the idea of AppDir, but :

 - I like the idea of using /etc/menu-methods to create a menu with all the
   installed programs. In your latest rox-cvs you have copied my
   /etc/menu-methods/rox , but this isn't very usefull without a working
   AppDir.
   
 - I think that the 'official' Debian ROX should work like ROX. If it works
   different (for example no AppDir), it should be renamed to something 
   else. 

Anyway, If you create a rox-deb with working AppDir, then I think it is a
good idea to use your package instead of mine. 

BTW.: Any plans to package rox-session? ;-)


-- 
Met vriendelijke groetjes         - Jan Wagemakers -

... movl $1, %eax  ;  movl $0, %ebx  ;  int $0x80