[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#157400: marked as done (ITP: libsdl-sge -- Set of graphic functions that use SDL)



Your message dated Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:30:04 -0400
with message-id <E17jEK4-000456-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#157400: fixed in libsdl-sge 020104-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2002 14:33:56 +0000
>From acid@chulak.naquadah.org Tue Aug 20 09:33:56 2002
Return-path: <acid@chulak.naquadah.org>
Received: from dyn-212-47-237-205.ppp.tiscali.fr (chulak.naquadah.org) [212.47.237.205] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17hA4y-0006aT-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 09:33:56 -0500
Received: from acid by chulak.naquadah.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17hA58-0000zp-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:34:06 +0200
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:34:06 +0200
From: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libsdl-sge -- Set of graphic functions that use SDL
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020820143406.GA3821@chulak.naquadah.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Useless-Header: Ceci est un header qui ne sert a rien alors pourquoi le lisez vous ?
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable 2.4.19 on i686
Sender: Julien Danjou <acid@chulak.naquadah.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-20
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libsdl-sge
  Version         : 020104
  Upstream Author : Anders Lindström <cal@swipnet.se>
* URL             : http://www.etek.chalmers.se/~e8cal1/sge/index.html
* License         : LGPL
  Description     : Set of graphic functions that use SDL

SDL is a low level API and if you don't want to spend time writing
your own graphic functions (put pixel, line, circle...) you could use
SGE instead.


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux chulak 2.4.19 #1 lun aoû 5 02:25:33 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR

-- 
Julien Danjou

(°>  - http://jdanjou.org       <jdanjou@jdanjou.org> -
//\  - http://tuxfamily.org   <jdanjou@tuxfamily.org> -
V_/_ GPG: 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974  C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 157400-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2002 07:39:18 +0000
>From rdonald@auric.debian.org Mon Aug 26 02:39:18 2002
Return-path: <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17jET0-0006wG-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 02:39:18 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 17jEK4-000456-00; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:30:04 -0400
From: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
To: 157400-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.17 $
Subject: Bug#157400: fixed in libsdl-sge 020104-1
Message-Id: <E17jEK4-000456-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Randall Donald <rdonald@auric.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:30:04 -0400
Delivered-To: 157400-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libsdl-sge, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsdl-sge-dev_020104-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsdl-sge/libsdl-sge-dev_020104-1_i386.deb
libsdl-sge_020104-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libsdl-sge/libsdl-sge_020104-1.diff.gz
libsdl-sge_020104-1.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libsdl-sge/libsdl-sge_020104-1.dsc
libsdl-sge_020104-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsdl-sge/libsdl-sge_020104-1_i386.deb
libsdl-sge_020104.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libsdl-sge/libsdl-sge_020104.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 157400@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org> (supplier of updated libsdl-sge package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:08:44 +0200
Source: libsdl-sge
Binary: libsdl-sge libsdl-sge-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 020104-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
Changed-By: Julien Danjou <acid@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsdl-sge - Set of graphic functions that use SDL - development files
 libsdl-sge-dev - Set of graphic functions that use SDL
Closes: 157400
Changes: 
 libsdl-sge (020104-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release. (Closes: #157400)
Files: 
 e2943db2f510459fe45fa63840818ef1 644 - optional libsdl-sge_020104-1.dsc
 18ad27369282febfd7e1def216c21408 240299 - optional libsdl-sge_020104.orig.tar.gz
 d456690639955f8c2dd9441624cb41aa 1896 - optional libsdl-sge_020104-1.diff.gz
 739d7e46879e57953dcfc67ebe4f3952 14640 devel optional libsdl-sge-dev_020104-1_i386.deb
 9d006e3b7978bb3b8d5d11381c1f8ecc 106984 libs optional libsdl-sge_020104-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9YqLwpGK1HsL+5c0RAuTYAJwOp+E/WsKMA3WaP6vsj8iwvQD+RQCfe9to
dvImguxW2oX61Wno+0seyQ4=
=sDf6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: