[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#151340: marked as done (ITA: rep-xmms -- Rep language bindings for XMMS)



Your message dated Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:02:26 -0400
with message-id <E17PkiA-0008TQ-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#151340: fixed in rep-xmms 0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2002 06:55:20 +0000
>From aaronl@vitelus.com Sat Jun 29 01:55:20 2002
Return-path: <aaronl@vitelus.com>
Received: from vitelus.com [64.81.243.207] (aaronl)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17OC8d-0000RO-00; Sat, 29 Jun 2002 01:55:20 -0500
Received: from aaronl by vitelus.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17OC8T-0002z7-00; Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:55:09 -0700
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:55:09 -0700
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
	Debian BTS Submissions <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: rep-xmms
Message-ID: <20020629065509.GA11174@vitelus.com>
References: <E17NsoQ-0002qt-00@auric.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E17NsoQ-0002qt-00@auric.debian.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 06:17:10AM -0400, Christian Marillat wrote:
>  sawfish (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
>  .
>    * Upload to unstable (Closes: #151230)
>    * sawfish-gnome doesn't exist anymore. Add a fake sawfish-gnome who
>      install sawfish.

When I try to upgrade sawfish, I am greeted with:

The following extra packages will be installed:
  bonobo-activation gconf2 gnome-mime-data gnome-vfs-extfs libart-2.0-2
  libatk1.0-0 libbonobo-activation4 libbonobo2-0 libbonobo2-common
  libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libfam0 libgconf2-4 libglade2-0
  libglib2.0-0 libgnome2-0 libgnome2-common libgnome2-segv libgnomecanvas2-0
  libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common libgnomevfs2-0
  libgnomevfs2-common libgtk-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common liblinc1
  liborbit2 libpango-common libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common librep9 rep-gt=
k=20
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  bonobo-activation gconf2 gnome-mime-data gnome-vfs-extfs libart-2.0-2
  libatk1.0-0 libbonobo-activation4 libbonobo2-0 libbonobo2-common
  libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libfam0 libgconf2-4 libglade2-0
  libglib2.0-0 libgnome2-0 libgnome2-common libgnome2-segv libgnomecanvas2-0
  libgnomecanvas2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common libgnomevfs2-0
  libgnomevfs2-common libgtk-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-common liblinc1
  liborbit2 libpango-common libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-common=20
The following held packages will be changed:
  rep-gtk=20

This isn't acceptable. I've used sawfish for a long time because I admire
its speed and elegance. This really inverts everything that sawfish means to
me. I'm *not* going to run it if it's linked to 30MB (just ask apt) of libs
that I will otherwise never use. I think it's really too bad because I like
sawfish and it won't be easy to replace (since I've writen a bit of custom
code). Now that I am moving to another window manager, I can no longer
maintain rep-xmms whose primary use is through sawfish (using the
sawfish-xmms package).

The only outstanding bug is #147733, which I have verified the existance of
on several unfortunate occasions.

--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9HVnNdtqQf66JWJkRAspcAJ9ls7Gni+aLrvlB5RACuabbiiIQmgCeNj3z
e8wFLrORPJB8Tj6TN0Krc/4=
=UV63
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 151340-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2002 14:05:31 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Wed Jul 03 09:05:31 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17Pkl9-0001Hb-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:05:31 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17PkiA-0008TQ-00; Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:02:26 -0400
From: Johannes Hirche <jhirche@debian.org>
To: 151340-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.24 $
Subject: Bug#151340: fixed in rep-xmms 0.4-2
Message-Id: <E17PkiA-0008TQ-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 10:02:26 -0400
Delivered-To: 151340-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rep-xmms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rep-xmms_0.4-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-2.diff.gz
rep-xmms_0.4-2.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-2.dsc
rep-xmms_0.4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/rep-xmms_0.4-2_i386.deb
sawfish-xmms_0.4-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/r/rep-xmms/sawfish-xmms_0.4-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 151340@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Johannes Hirche <jhirche@debian.org> (supplier of updated rep-xmms package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed,  3 Jul 2002 15:40:18 +0200
Source: rep-xmms
Binary: sawfish-xmms rep-xmms
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Johannes Hirche <jhirche@debian.org>
Changed-By: Johannes Hirche <jhirche@debian.org>
Description: 
 rep-xmms   - rep language bindings for XMMS
 sawfish-xmms - sawfish bindings for XMMS
Closes: 151340
Changes: 
 rep-xmms (0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Maintainer (Closes: #151340)
Files: 
 548bff697cecd5f4d9460ab6efbc4199 673 interpreters extra rep-xmms_0.4-2.dsc
 5af8bfa3391c79e1ef33c8f02108634c 2050 interpreters extra rep-xmms_0.4-2.diff.gz
 11b9b89f57d4e9cffe541067e67b8a66 31476 interpreters extra rep-xmms_0.4-2_i386.deb
 ad2a62f4b7a4c45d6e7ffcb8873c6966 6368 x11 extra sawfish-xmms_0.4-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9Iv+4HTwCX+ffw7cRAiR9AKCCJ83240lZCt1iKjSku/pSOoisCQCeLmyv
YJ6AOiMMEOAn4n6QELAVQP8=
=ZFAd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: