Bug#137915: Renamed to 'pm-base'
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:20:03AM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
>
> Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
powermgmt-utils?
I'm saying utils rather than base or common, because it provides a set of
small utilities for power management and that makes it more obvious (for me,
at least).
HTH,
Chris
--
Chris Halls | Frankfurt, Germany
Reply to: