On 12-Mar-2002 Thomas Hood wrote: > On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious >> name? > > How about 'pm-base' ? > no, it is the 'pm' part that is confusing. -common, -base, -essential. Name it how you like. But the name 'pm-common' or 'pm-base' tells me nothing about the package or why anacron or apmd want it.