[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#133226: marked as done (ITA: docbook-doc -- Documentation for the DocBook DTD.)



Your message dated Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:02:27 -0500
with message-id <E16cB2R-0000yV-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#133226: fixed in docbook-doc 30d10-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2002 16:42:46 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Feb 10 10:42:46 2002
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16Zx3u-0004OP-00; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:42:46 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
	by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 334AC366A46; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:42:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id DF147357C4; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:42:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EC56023B29; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:42:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:42:42 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Christian Leutloff <leutloff@debian.org>,
	Andreas Tille <TilleA@rki.de>
Subject: O: docbook-doc -- Documentation for the DocBook DTD.
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020210174242.A1900@fisch.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

The current maintainer of docbook-doc, Christian Leutloff
<leutloff@debian.org>, is currently busy and has therefore orphaned
this package.  If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it --
retitle this bug from 'O:' to 'ITA:', fix the outstanding bugs and
upload a new version with your name in the Maintainer: field and a

   * New maintainer (Closes: #thisbug)

in the changelog so this bug is closed.


Some information about this package:

Package: docbook-doc
Priority: optional
Section: text
Installed-Size: 4269
Maintainer: Christian Leutloff <leutloff@debian.org>
Architecture: all
Version: 30d10-5
Filename: pool/main/d/docbook-doc/docbook-doc_30d10-5_all.deb
Size: 775116
MD5sum: a914168f06e9cc4678f2af1530566a17
Description: Documentation for the DocBook DTD.
 The DocBook DTD was developed specifically for computer software
 documentation, that is, user manuals and programming references.
 .
 This set of documentation includes the following titles:
  - Overview of the DocBook DTD
  - User's Guide for the DocBook DTD
  - Guide to the DocBook DTD
  - Reference for the DocBook DTD
  - Customizer's Guide for the DocBook DTD

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 133226-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2002 20:06:46 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sat Feb 16 14:06:46 2002
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16cB6b-0003M5-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:06:46 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16cB2R-0000yV-00; Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:02:27 -0500
From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
To: 133226-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.68 $
Subject: Bug#133226: fixed in docbook-doc 30d10-6
Message-Id: <E16cB2R-0000yV-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:02:27 -0500
Delivered-To: 133226-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
docbook-doc, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

docbook-doc_30d10-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/docbook-doc/docbook-doc_30d10-6.diff.gz
docbook-doc_30d10-6.dsc
  to pool/main/d/docbook-doc/docbook-doc_30d10-6.dsc
docbook-doc_30d10-6_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/docbook-doc/docbook-doc_30d10-6_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 133226@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org> (supplier of updated docbook-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 20:22:29 +0100
Source: docbook-doc
Binary: docbook-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 30d10-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
Changed-By: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>
Description: 
 docbook-doc - Documentation for the DocBook DTD.
Closes: 111260 133226 133558
Changes: 
 docbook-doc (30d10-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (closes: #133226).
   * Fixed the convert_images script (closes: #133558, #111260).
   * Removed Emacs-specific stuff from changelog.
Files: 
 f80d66c65b2e9de52db19065e78f0a10 593 text optional docbook-doc_30d10-6.dsc
 9ed7f9eeb18b4c8924c0c344126840f3 3560 text optional docbook-doc_30d10-6.diff.gz
 643fd4567d7a0f8168c69fc5603db954 1533284 text optional docbook-doc_30d10-6_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Pour information voir http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8bXPGDqdWtRRIQ/URAubOAKCA5/mbxoGHUleyx4jTyZAXMG6u6QCfVhsS
Zi7KWogrM4EgTbo7suqa30w=
=uXWe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: