Bug#111274: marked as done (ITA: doc-linux-ja -- Linux HOWTOs in Japanese)
Your message dated Sun, 09 Dec 2001 14:58:29 -0500
with message-id <E16DA5l-0004fa-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#111274: fixed in doc-linux-ja 2001.10.30-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2001 01:17:44 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Tue Sep 04 20:17:44 2001
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from ikura.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp [131.112.171.65]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15eRK3-0004p1-00; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 20:17:44 -0500
Received: (qmail 22329 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 01:17:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp) (131.112.171.110)
by 131.112.171.65 with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 01:17:30 -0000
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:17:30 +0900
Message-ID: <w53lmjua11x.wl@megaela.fe.dis.titech.ac.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: doc-linux-ja -- Linux HOWTOs in Japanese
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.15 (More Than Words) EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 10) (Capitol Reef) (i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.9 - "Euglena tripteris")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to adopt doc-linux-ja, Japanese version of doc-linux.
The reason to adopt is that Colin Watson is also written as follows:
> Martin Michlmayr orphaned Marco Budde's packages today, as they don't
> appear to have been actively maintained for quite some time. I intend to
> adopt doc-linux (binary packages doc-linux-html and doc-linux-text),
> which is pretty seriously in need of an update before woody is released.
Marco Budde is packaged in 1999.12, but we JF Project
(most contents of doc-linux-ja are contributed by this project)
keeps activity to maintain these documentation, so almost
docs becomes old. To keep these docs so old is harmful
for user and newbies (other doc-linux-* seems old, too).
-- GOTO Masanori
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 111274-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Dec 2001 19:59:11 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Dec 09 13:59:11 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16DA6R-0001Dd-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 13:59:11 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16DA5l-0004fa-00; Sun, 09 Dec 2001 14:58:29 -0500
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: 111274-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.66 $
Subject: Bug#111274: fixed in doc-linux-ja 2001.10.30-1
Message-Id: <E16DA5l-0004fa-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 14:58:29 -0500
Delivered-To: 111274-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
doc-linux-ja, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
doc-linux-ja-html_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
to pool/main/d/doc-linux-ja/doc-linux-ja-html_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
doc-linux-ja-text_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
to pool/main/d/doc-linux-ja/doc-linux-ja-text_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/doc-linux-ja/doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.diff.gz
doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.dsc
to pool/main/d/doc-linux-ja/doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.dsc
doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/doc-linux-ja/doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 111274@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp> (supplier of updated doc-linux-ja package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:53:48 +0900
Source: doc-linux-ja
Binary: doc-linux-ja-html doc-linux-ja-text
Architecture: source all
Version: 2001.10.30-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Changed-By: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Description:
doc-linux-ja-html - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in Japanese (HTML format)
doc-linux-ja-text - Linux HOWTOs and FAQs in Japanese (TEXT format)
Closes: 66614 96022 111274
Changes:
doc-linux-ja (2001.10.30-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer (closes: Bug#111274).
* New upstream versions 2001-10-30 (closes: Bug#66614).
* Update standards version 3.5.2.
* License file updates.
* Move from dwww to doc-base (closes: Bug#96022).
Files:
e810fcd805157a4cc0d98048ea383b30 693 doc optional doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.dsc
f1c6e21fc19b2e0d68d30eb477f8adbe 13251742 doc optional doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30.orig.tar.gz
0695c06c179f44764e9900263979cce8 5274 doc optional doc-linux-ja_2001.10.30-1.diff.gz
24f6885b83c2361968eb59f33c43e07e 7710606 doc optional doc-linux-ja-html_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
b54df47837cc8a16ab9be671d7eab7b7 5812764 doc optional doc-linux-ja-text_2001.10.30-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: KUHASIKU WA http://www.gnupg.org/ WO GORANKUDASAI
iD8DBQE7/zWT9dAn0Xqx8P4RAlGaAJ9hrPHY2u36srFU1PlWf+C4Qp60FACffph2
j99v7hsaaqhdq7A5Jgi+pOY=
=M9J6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: