Bug#79858: marked as done (ITP: slash -- slashdot engine)
Your message dated Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:50:52 +0100
with message-id <20011108095052.A27689@lina.inka.de>
and subject line slash as a Debian package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2000 22:49:02 +0000
>From ecki@lina.inka.de Sun Dec 17 16:49:02 2000
Return-path: <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [212.227.14.2] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 147mc2-0000Xp-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 16:49:02 -0600
Received: from calista.inka.de (lina.inka.de [212.227.16.17])
by mail.inka.de with esmtp
id 147mby-00088p-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:49:00 +0100
Received: from ecki by calista.inka.de with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
id 147mbp-0005kq-00; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:48:49 +0100
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Subject: wnpp: ITP: slash1.1
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.7
Message-Id: <E147mbp-0005kq-00@calista.inka.de>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 23:48:49 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I would like to package slash, the cade behind slashdot. It is based on mysl
and mod_perl/apache. It is GPL. I intend to make a slash1.1 package for the
new bender version.
http://slashcode.com/about.shtml
Greetings
Bernd
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Kernel Version: Linux calista 2.4.0-test12 #2 Wed Dec 13 23:38:03 CET 2000 i686 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 79858-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Nov 2001 08:50:57 +0000
>From ecki@lina.inka.de Thu Nov 08 02:50:57 2001
Return-path: <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Received: from quechua.inka.de (mail.inka.de) [212.227.14.2] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 161ktk-0001lZ-00; Thu, 08 Nov 2001 02:50:57 -0600
Received: from calista.inka.de (lina.inka.de [212.227.16.17])
by mail.inka.de with esmtp
id 161kti-0002Ji-00; Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:50:55 +0100
Received: from ecki by calista.inka.de with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 161kth-0007Ex-00; Thu, 08 Nov 2001 09:50:53 +0100
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2001 09:50:52 +0100
To: Hrishi <hrishi@ece.utexas.edu>
Cc: ecki@debian.org, 79858-done@bugs.debian.org,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: slash as a Debian package
Message-ID: <20011108095052.A27689@lina.inka.de>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10111072334370.14386-100000@tick.ece.utexas.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10111072334370.14386-100000@tick.ece.utexas.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@lina.inka.de>
Delivered-To: 79858-done@bugs.debian.org
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:35:35PM -0600, Hrishi wrote:
> I saw your post on slashcode.com. Are you still working on making a
> slash Debian package ?
I gave up on it. I will cloe the ITP on bugs.debian.org. It is because the
Database Installation is kind of trouble, and pslash is a smaller system and
enough for my requirements.
I actually done some packaging, so if anybody is looking into that, he may
ask me for me work.
Greetings
Bernd
--
(OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Wendelinusstrasse39.76646Bruchsal.de --
( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://home.pages.de/~eckes/
o--o *plush* 2048/93600EFD eckes@irc +497257930613 BE5-RIPE
(O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
Reply to: