Bug#114336: ITP: xpostit-i18n -- simple postit program on X with I18N support

["Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>]

>> Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org> writes:

 > I'd thought that adding suffix (-18n) shows that the applied I18N
 > patch has not been merged into the original upstream of xpostit.  But
 > this may not be necessary.
 > 
 > Do you think just simple "xpostit" better ?

 Yes, I think it'd be better, precisely because of the reason you state:
 if the patch is added upstream, this is no longer a "special" version
 of xpostit, which, without having any further information, sounds
 likely.

-- 
Marcelo             | REMIND ME AGAIN, he said, HOW THE LITTLE HORSE-SHAPED
mmagallo@debian.org | ONES MOVE.
                    |         -- Death on symbolic last games
                    |            (Terry Pratchett, Small Gods)