[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#100224: marked as done (ITA: freefont)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:56:38 -0400
with message-id <E15iKcI-0001OL-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#100224: fixed in freefont 0.10-11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:20 +0000
>From GBechly@gmx.de Sat Jun 09 08:48:20 2001
Return-path: <GBechly@gmx.de>
Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [::ffff:] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 158j6C-0000FK-00; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:48:20 -0500
Received: (qmail 4825 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jun 2001 13:48:19 -0000
Received: from pd9025bee.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO localhost.localdomain) (
  by mail.gmx.net (mail01) with SMTP; 9 Jun 2001 13:48:19 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
From: Dr. Guenter Bechly <GBechly@gmx.de>
Reply-To: GBechly@gmx.de
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:56:11 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0106091429350I.03064@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: O: freefont
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Received: (at 100224-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2001 19:28:17 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sat Sep 15 14:28:17 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15iL6v-0001En-00; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:28:17 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15iKcI-0001OL-00; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:56:38 -0400
From: Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@debian.org>
To: 100224-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.59 $
Subject: Bug#100224: fixed in freefont 0.10-11
Message-Id: <E15iKcI-0001OL-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:56:38 -0400
Delivered-To: 100224-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
freefont, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/non-free/f/freefont/freefont_0.10-11_all.deb
  to pool/non-free/f/freefont/freefont_0.10-11.diff.gz
  to pool/non-free/f/freefont/freefont_0.10-11.dsc

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 100224@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@debian.org> (supplier of updated freefont package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 16:43:56 +1000
Source: freefont
Binary: freefont
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.10-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chanop Silpa-Anan <chanop@debian.org>
 freefont   - Freeware font selection for X11
Closes: 100224 100438
 freefont (0.10-11) unstable; urgency=low
   * New maintainer. (closes: #100224, #100438)
     Previous ITAs have been over three months.
   * Use Standards-Version: 3.5.6 .
 e127a8429608f1237f3d5e98134073bb 613 non-free/x11 optional freefont_0.10-11.dsc
 8e72a221a73892eb2d94c03e8e23c70e 3332 non-free/x11 optional freefont_0.10-11.diff.gz
 e3e5a418e0fd61f8508eeeb031da0116 2370902 non-free/x11 optional freefont_0.10-11_all.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org


Reply to: