Bug#110803: openjade, opensp
Yann Dirson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Current status: I have built a potato package of 1.3 (since this is what I
> needed for work), but being based on the jade 1.2 sid package I guess it can
> be rebuilt for sid with little problems.
You mean the latest Jade 1.2.1 right? I think it would be easier to
derive from the openjade in unstable because the jade package includes
sp and jade and two lib packages rather than one, so openjade is
> If you intend to modernize the jade 1.2 packaging, I can update the package
What's so non-modern about it?
> Also, I have potato rebuilds of opensp, jadetex, docbook-dsssl, and a couple
> of things, all done for work, which I'll put on the alcove-labs.org apt
> repository ASAP. Should register it in the page of unofficial apt sources
> as well.
I might be interested in that for work.... what's the URL?
...Adam Di Carlo..<email@example.com>...<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>