[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#110223: marked as done (ITP: procman -- easier-to-use replacement for gtop)



Your message dated Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05:14 -0400
with message-id <E15boAk-0007eV-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#110223: fixed in procman 0.10.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2001 03:10:32 +0000
>From jimdres@mindspring.com Sun Aug 26 22:10:32 2001
Return-path: <jimdres@mindspring.com>
Received: from (eeyore.lewismoss.org) [4.18.171.42] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15bCm0-0004zD-00; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:09:12 -0500
Received: from dres by eeyore.lewismoss.org with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 15bCle-0003al-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:08:50 -0400
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: procman
From: James LewisMoss <jimdres@mindspring.com>
X-Url: http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com
X-Organization: Debian/Software in the Public Interest
Original-Original-Sender: James LewisMoss <jimdres@mindspring.com>
X-Face:  "R3Ms&!j++.]J8DwisON-l7#S<Jw[MsP|I<K?28b~f-<w^vjeAQ-k@$-Az>OloY'V?!^-!2
 9G+7Z7OzClzr2{3e<RFn%f*t%B<*|sT->ni9BN\pzkTp<dg6+lOtI-rg*]Fjgr0n.=ChFX:_+T7fKT
 *Z[}xvSK"jV~QH7*v}xZ,1rlb+Ro`,)#2Econ*g^>}ehc,\AhKBZ\Sf/HVG+p\*?'(&ct2w6Fr:w9m
 o|9R&.D-)1]:&sN-6o'\`7W${f1$2BCy6qSl&._{ILYCZ?X-[?M!](N
Date: 26 Aug 2001 23:08:30 -0400
Message-ID: <[🔎] hhy9o68aj5.fsf@eeyore.lewismoss.org>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James LewisMoss <dres@lewismoss.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp

>From README:
Procman is a nicer, simpler, easier to use replacement
to gtop. It uses libgtop for the process monitoring
and e-table for the viewing.

It requires libgtop 1.0.6 or greater. It also requires gal
version 0.8.99.2 or greater. 


-- 
@James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>      |  Blessed Be!
@    http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com |  Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 110223-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2001 19:30:43 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Tue Aug 28 14:30:43 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15boZP-0000J8-00; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:30:43 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15boAk-0007eV-00; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05:14 -0400
From: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
To: 110223-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.57 $
Subject: Bug#110223: fixed in procman 0.10.1-1
Message-Id: <E15boAk-0007eV-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:05:14 -0400
Delivered-To: 110223-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
procman, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

procman_0.10.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/procman/procman_0.10.1-1.dsc
procman_0.10.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/procman/procman_0.10.1.orig.tar.gz
procman_0.10.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/procman/procman_0.10.1-1.diff.gz
procman_0.10.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/procman/procman_0.10.1-1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 110223@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org> (supplier of updated procman package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:47:27 -0400
Source: procman
Binary: procman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.10.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Changed-By: James LewisMoss <dres@debian.org>
Description: 
 procman    - Gnome process viewer
Closes: 110223
Changes: 
 procman (0.10.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream. (Closes: #110223)
Files: 
 b5f44b030b2f5c2151f22fa29c794360 1423 admin optional procman_0.10.1-1.dsc
 87d66a09ca9478a324c85867a88f9abc 227409 admin optional procman_0.10.1.orig.tar.gz
 c30de51e9977e21166b26ff3503d75cf 9961 admin optional procman_0.10.1-1.diff.gz
 a7f5e6a2aeabafc67e68e471c11b72c4 53688 admin optional procman_0.10.1-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
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=gVAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: