Bug#99755: marked as done (ITP: mosix0.98 -- ITP: mosix0.98 -- mosix for the 2.2.19 kernels.)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:03:03 -0400
with message-id <E15G3Xj-0000tu-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#99755: fixed in mosix0.98 0.98.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2001 05:04:42 +0000
>From gandalf@infofin.com Sun Jun 03 00:04:42 2001
Return-path: <gandalf@infofin.com>
Received: from mybill.vsnl.com (bom9.vsnl.net.in) [202.54.1.72]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 156Q49-0000MU-00; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 00:04:42 -0500
Received: from vega.linux.in (unknown [203.199.58.141])
by bom9.vsnl.net.in (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7EAD787D8; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 10:34:36 +0530 (IST)
Received: from viral by vega.linux.in with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 156FgY-00007H-00; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 23:29:38 +0530
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 23:29:38 +0530
From: Viral <viral@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: mosix0.98 -- ITP: mosix0.98 -- mosix for the 2.2.19 kernels.
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20010602232938.A447@phi.kappa.beta>
Reply-To: Viral <viral@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
Sender: Viral <viral@phi.kappa.beta>
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-06-02
Severity: wishlist
Mosix is available from www.mosix.org under the GPL license.
Version 1.0.3 for the 2.4.5 kernel is already in unstable. However,=20
version 0.98 is for the 2.2.19 kernels, which might be useful to some
people, and might be a little more stable too.
viral
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux vega 2.4.5 #1 Sat May 26 12:01:15 IST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC
--=20
And if your head explodes with dark forebodings too,
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon.
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjsZKYoACgkQDAJ08G4l4oPvugCfeTxJmRdUTRZDSFWFkbkXKTW2
kFoAmgNKzbPviqvUGKfFdViSShAmNkGq
=jeIQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 99755-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 19:21:35 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Fri Jun 29 14:21:35 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15G3pe-0002Ql-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:21:34 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15G3Xj-0000tu-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:03:03 -0400
From: Viral <viral@debian.org>
To: 99755-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.50 $
Subject: Bug#99755: fixed in mosix0.98 0.98.0-1
Message-Id: <E15G3Xj-0000tu-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:03:03 -0400
Delivered-To: 99755-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mosix0.98, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.dsc
to pool/main/m/mosix0.98/mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.dsc
mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mosix0.98/mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
mosix0.98_0.98.0.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/mosix0.98/mosix0.98_0.98.0.orig.tar.gz
kernel-patch-mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mosix0.98/kernel-patch-mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/m/mosix0.98/mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.diff.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 99755@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Viral <viral@debian.org> (supplier of updated mosix0.98 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:27:20 +0530
Source: mosix0.98
Binary: mosix0.98 kernel-patch-mosix0.98
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.98.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Viral <viral@debian.org>
Changed-By: Viral <viral@debian.org>
Description:
kernel-patch-mosix0.98 - Kernel patch for mosix0.98
mosix0.98 - Utilities to administer a mosix multicomputer node
Closes: 99755
Changes:
mosix0.98 (0.98.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #99755)
Files:
864eb027fb8daa0ece4c79c6b9cc1ac2 663 net extra mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.dsc
38123bf8a493a34afa2b435d6fc5d56b 158266 net extra mosix0.98_0.98.0.orig.tar.gz
dc5a85f6409c315338d5cb15f2aa1f21 472940 net extra mosix0.98_0.98.0-1.diff.gz
cbd37da9ef4d7a1ea1f5ba01af291b03 137948 net extra mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
cd5e52089fdd256323a11eaf39bc114b 464812 net extra kernel-patch-mosix0.98_0.98.0-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjs5xIcACgkQDAJ08G4l4oN/nQCghjsMYu9M7QGc+KN24hkHH4qJ
eUQAniCUy85mvRPVjJQ12rOv2ErLxRD3
=jFeU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: