[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#82725: marked as done (ITP: pkgset-tools, pkgset-tools-gnome)



Your message dated Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:39:33 -0500
with message-id <871yoayg62.fsf@vger.pretzelnet.null>
and subject line Closing some failed ITPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2001 18:19:25 +0000
>From epg@indy.progenylinux.com Thu Jan 18 12:19:24 2001
Return-path: <epg@indy.progenylinux.com>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [::ffff:216.234.231.6] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14JJed-0003My-00; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:19:23 -0600
Received: (qmail 16558 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2001 16:45:25 -0000
Received: from pm3naxs12-218.naxs.com (HELO london.progenylinux.com) (postfix@216.98.81.218)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2001 16:45:25 -0000
Received: from andromeda.indy.progenylinux.com (andromeda [64.64.82.228])
	by london.progenylinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E9E23D48
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:39:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from vger.indy.progeny.com (liddy.indy.progeny.com [64.64.82.249])
	by andromeda.indy.progenylinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907251BE2B
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:40:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from epg by vger.indy.progeny.com with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian))
	id 14JI2w-0007Zb-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 11:36:22 -0500
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: pkgset-tools, pkgset-tools-gnome
From: epg@progeny.com (Eric Gillespie, Jr.)
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://www.indy.progeny.com/~epg/epg.asc
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 0A2A C675 9C64 A03F B2DB  F8BB C897 FC18 9CFE AF46
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: 18 Jan 2001 11:36:20 -0500
Message-ID: <873degrf5n.fsf@vger.indy.progeny.com>
Lines: 49
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.14.5 (based on Gnus v5.8.7) (revision 06) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)
Sender: "Eric Gillespie Jr." <epg@indy.progenylinux.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

Package sets are an alternative to task packages that we came up
when we ran into the limitations of task packages with Progeny
Debian. One of the biggest problems with task packages is
installing your system with them and later trying to remove
something (say, xterm). You get an error because
task-x-window-system is still installed. If you remove the task
package, you lose future updates to it.

To avoid this, package sets are simply files containing a list
of packages. These files are conffiles, so you can change the
contents of a set however you like.

pkgset-tools contains what were originally going to be the start
of Python bindings to libapt-pkg, the pkgset Python module, and a
very primitive and basic command-line tool, apt-pkgset. When i
learned that apt 0.4 already contains Python bindings, i stopped
worrying about making my python-apt usable outside the pkgset
module. python-apt will disappear when apt 0.4 is released.

pkgset-tools-gnome contains gnome-apt-pkgset (a GNOME interface
to package sets), gnome-dpkg-reconfigure (a GNOME interface to
the Debconf system, not the same as our configlets, which will be
in a separate ITP), and gsu-helper (a secure way to run a program
as root in a graphical environment, which will eventually move
into a separate package with similar interfaces to passwd,
adduser, and friends).

If you want to try these out, source is available at

http://archive.progeny.com/dists/progeny/main/source/admin/

and binaries at

http://archive.progeny.com/dists/progeny/main/binary-i386/admin/

These packages work on unstable, probably work on testing, and
won't work on stable.

Both packages are Copyright (C) 2000  Progeny Linux Systems, Inc.
and are released under the GNU GPL.

-- 
Eric Gillespie, Jr. <*> epg@progeny.com
Software Developer
Progeny Linux Systems - http://progeny.com


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 82725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2001 22:46:19 +0000
>From epg@pretzelnet.org Sat Jun 23 17:46:19 2001
Return-path: <epg@pretzelnet.org>
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [::ffff:207.217.121.12] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15DwAV-0003NJ-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:46:19 -0500
Received: from dethstar.pretzelnet.org (sdn-ar-005inindiP310.dialsprint.net [63.178.201.176])
	by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13482;
	Sat, 23 Jun 2001 15:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vger.pretzelnet.null (unknown [172.16.12.5])
	by dethstar.pretzelnet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7CC2E42BD; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:49:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from epg by vger.pretzelnet.null with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 15Dw3y-0007hX-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:39:34 -0500
To: 93974-done@bugs.debian.org, 82725-done@bugs.debian.org,
        91266-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing some failed ITPs
From: epg@pobox.com (Eric Gillespie, Jr.)
X-PGP: 1024D/44703332 156D 6115 C368 CDA9 81CA  C892 3D39 98D2 4470 3332
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 17:39:33 -0500
Message-ID: <871yoayg62.fsf@vger.pretzelnet.null>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.0.103
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: "Eric Gillespie Jr." <epg@pretzelnet.org>
Delivered-To: 82725-done@bugs.debian.org

Sadly, i'll never get around to packaging these.

-- 
Eric Gillespie, Jr.
mailto:epg@pobox.com <*> jabber:pretzelgod@jabber.org

"This movie sure is gory!"
"Yeah, but that's one cute pig."



Reply to: