Bug#98187: marked as done (ITA: groff -- GNU troff text-formatting system.)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:47:41 +0100
with message-id <20010612234741.A21395@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line ITA: groff -- GNU troff text-formatting system.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 May 2001 23:48:56 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Sun May 20 18:48:56 2001
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from mta02-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.42]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 151cwR-0007ow-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 18:48:55 -0500
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([213.107.104.43]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <20010520234854.BPLH290.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@riva.ucam.org>;
Mon, 21 May 2001 00:48:54 +0100
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 151cwP-0000R0-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 00:48:53 +0100
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:48:52 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITA: groff -- GNU troff text-formatting system.
Message-ID: <20010521004852.A1335@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.16
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Sender: Colin Watson <cjw44@riva.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: important
It doesn't seem like anybody else is working on groff; I've contacted
Federico di Gregorio, who offered to adopt it a while back, and he
hasn't had the time. I've already done some of the (messy) jgroff
merging required to package groff 1.17, and I should be able to upload
with a week or so.
--
Colin Watson [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 98187-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2001 22:48:03 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Tue Jun 12 17:48:03 2001
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [::ffff:62.253.162.47]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 159wx3-00013J-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:47:58 -0500
Received: from riva.ucam.org ([62.253.132.222]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
id <20010612224741.XIDY285.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@riva.ucam.org>
for <98187-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:47:41 +0100
Received: from cjw44 by riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
for 98187-done@bugs.debian.org
id 159wwo-0005uK-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:47:42 +0100
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:47:41 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
To: 98187-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: groff -- GNU troff text-formatting system.
Message-ID: <20010612234741.A21395@riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010521004852.A1335@riva.ucam.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Organization: riva.ucam.org
Sender: Colin Watson <cjw44@riva.ucam.org>
Delivered-To: 98187-done@bugs.debian.org
On Mon, 21 May 2001 at 00:48:52 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: important
>
> It doesn't seem like anybody else is working on groff; I've contacted
> Federico di Gregorio, who offered to adopt it a while back, and he
> hasn't had the time. I've already done some of the (messy) jgroff
> merging required to package groff 1.17, and I should be able to upload
> with a week or so.
Oh yeah, forgot to close this (thanks, Oskuro). I adopted groff a week
and a half ago.
--
Colin Watson [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: