Bug#96717: Correct way to make an ITA

To: Noel Koethe <noel@koethe.net>, <97664@bugs.debian.org>, <96717@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: <control@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Bug#96717: Correct way to make an ITA
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 21:59:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0105162154050.8546-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
Reply-to: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>, 96717@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0105161216070.26512-100000@data.wipol.uni-bonn.de>

close 97664
retitle 96717 ITA: distributed-net -- donate unused CPU cycles - client for distributed.net
retitle

Hi Noel,

please read [1]. This describes that you have to retitle the existing bug
instead of sending a new one (fixed with the control message above).

cu
Adrian

[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/


-- 

Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Correct way to make an ITA
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

References:
- Bug#97664: ITA: distributed-net -- donate unused CPU cycles - client for distributed.net
  - From: Noel Koethe <noel@koethe.net>

Prev by Date: Bug#81331: marked as done (ITP: xotcl -- Extended OTcl, an object oriented scripting language)
Next by Date: Processed: Correct way to make an ITA
Previous by thread: Bug#97664: ITA: distributed-net -- donate unused CPU cycles - client for distributed.net
Next by thread: Processed: Correct way to make an ITA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread