On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 01:54:39AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I thought it was removed from Debian because it had so many security
> > flaws.
>
> AFAIR it was removed at the end of the potato freeze because it had a
> known security hole with a known fix but upstream didn't release a new
> version and the old copyright did forbit the distribution of modified
> binaries. The new licence as quoted in the last mail doesn't seem to have
> this problem (although I think it doesn't comply to the DFSG because it's
> a licence in the style of the old BSD licence _with_ the advertising
> clause).
Which clause of the DFSG prohibits that?
-------------------------------------------
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>
-------------------------------------------
See also: http://tinc.nl.linux.org/
http://www.kernelbench.org/
-------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgp0ue_UgrutX.pgp
Description: PGP signature