Re: Bug#94735: ITP: nbtscan -- NetBIOS Name Network Scanner
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:10:12PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Ryszard Lach wrote:
>
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > NBTscan is a program for scanning IP networks for NetBIOS name information. It
> > sends NetBIOS status query to each address in supplied range and lists received
> > information in human readable form. For each responded host it lists IP address,
> > NetBIOS computer name, logged-in user name and MAC address
>
> What are the advantages of using this program instead of 'nmblookup' from the
> samba-common package?
They say (and write in manual) that nmblookup can find any host names searching
with given broadcast, but I did not manage to force it to receive an output like
this:
$ nbtscan 192.168.1.0/24
IP address NetBIOS Name Server User MAC address
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
192.168.1.2 PROD <server> PROD 00-48-54-53-09-ca
192.168.1.8 SIACO <server> SIACO 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.20 RALF <server> RALF 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.44 GUCIO <server> GUCIO 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.97 CYTOP <server> CYTOP 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.65 NEURYT <server> W3ADMIN 00-01-02-1d-bf-1f
192.168.1.98 PRODUX <server> PRODUX 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.121 SPHERUX <server> SPHERUX 00-00-00-00-00-00
192.168.1.183 WRZASQN <server> WRZASQN 00-60-08-3d-a8-d5
192.168.1.193 TOMEK <server> TST 00-48-54-53-0f-b4
192.168.1.201 PITEC <server> PPO 00-50-ba-bb-ae-ba
192.168.1.203 SEKRETARIAT <server> SEKRETARIAT 00-c0-df-ec-ad-43
192.168.1.232 DARKEST <server> DARKEST 00-01-02-d9-9d-04
192.168.1.208 OLEJ <server> OLEJ 00-50-ba-d5-28-aa
192.168.1.210 VENOMRB <server> RBE 00-50-ba-bb-b0-f5
192.168.1.236 DKI <server> DKI 00-c0-df-08-4c-3c
I think this tool is very useful. If you don't - I won't waste my time for
packaging it.
R.
--
** Internet Designers S.A., ul. Przedmiejska 6--10, 54-201 Wrocław **
tel. (071) 35 00 445 w. 25; fax (071) 37 35 946; http://www.id.pl/
Reply to: