[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#78680: marked as done (ITA: cocoon -- A XML/XSL publishing framework servlet)



Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2001 14:54:56 -0400
with message-id <E14orfk-0001g9-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#78680: fixed in cocoon 1.8-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2000 15:48:59 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun Dec 03 09:48:59 2000
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 142bNr-0000G6-00; Sun, 03 Dec 2000 09:48:59 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA29321;
	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:47:17 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA03198;
	Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:47:17 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14890.27397.441067.813012@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:47:17 +0100 (MET)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
CC: julio@pobox.com
Subject: O: cocoon - A XML/XSL publishing framework servlet
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: cocoon

The package depends on /recommends:

    lib-fop-java lib-openxml-java lib-xslp-java

Newer versions of cocoon eventually do not need these packages.



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 78680-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2001 19:03:05 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sun Apr 15 14:03:05 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14ornd-0006e0-00; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 14:03:05 -0500
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14orfk-0001g9-00; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 14:54:56 -0400
From: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
To: 78680-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.39 $
Subject: Bug#78680: fixed in cocoon 1.8-1
Message-Id: <E14orfk-0001g9-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 14:54:56 -0400
Delivered-To: 78680-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cocoon, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cocoon_1.8-1.diff.gz
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon_1.8-1.diff.gz
cocoon-lib_1.8-1_all.deb
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon-lib_1.8-1_all.deb
cocoon-doc_1.8-1_all.deb
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon-doc_1.8-1_all.deb
cocoon_1.8-1_all.deb
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon_1.8-1_all.deb
cocoon_1.8-1.dsc
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon_1.8-1.dsc
cocoon-example_1.8-1_all.deb
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon-example_1.8-1_all.deb
cocoon_1.8.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/contrib/c/cocoon/cocoon_1.8.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 78680@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> (supplier of updated cocoon package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 11:00:03 +0200
Source: cocoon
Binary: cocoon-lib cocoon cocoon-example cocoon-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.8-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>
Description: 
 cocoon     - A XML/XSL publishing framework servlet
 cocoon-doc - Documentation for Cocoon
 cocoon-example - An example of what cocoon can do.
 cocoon-lib - An example of what cocoon can do.
Closes: 61549 65389 67854 67865 71142 72390 74187 78680 89061
Changes: 
 cocoon (1.8-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial rerelease, adopted package, closes: Bug#78680.
   * New source package, the previous version had was never built from source
     but the source was in the jar file. That is now fixed and
     the source are built with ant and with some help from the classfile.zip
     in jdk1.1, closes: Bug#72390, #67865, #61549.
   * Removed suggestion of nonexisting package, closes: Bug#74187.
   * Now works with tomcat, closes: #89061.
   * Changed so that lib-fop-java is recommended,
     closes: Bug#67854, #65389, #71142.
Files: 
 cae508351e2b26f8d09e14858148cbd8 738 contrib/web optional cocoon_1.8-1.dsc
 a9c343d2d5c3116d6962c3d8c206c615 3768936 contrib/web optional cocoon_1.8.orig.tar.gz
 bb4e626a57c3b32aae508ae6b9145a3b 11605 contrib/web optional cocoon_1.8-1.diff.gz
 95c60deeacf1805577550029ff5830aa 194072 contrib/web optional cocoon_1.8-1_all.deb
 68610d3870e4af7b4684c444c13cc827 1321416 contrib/doc optional cocoon-doc_1.8-1_all.deb
 488e6782643928c469da4e8e6bdca37a 167600 contrib/web optional cocoon-example_1.8-1_all.deb
 330240acc0c76c1925a449bb3043e232 364650 contrib/libs optional cocoon-lib_1.8-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: För information se http://www.gnupg.org/

iD8DBQE61sMeGKGxzw/lPdkRAgP5AJ4qUYMHX7tWcFTkfiA4Y27byn1XggCeKRl3
f8blpaEr2ymzPyuFcgLgKt4=
=R8I3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: