[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#91765: marked as done (ITP: c2050 -- Driver for Lexmark 2050 Series printers)



Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:53:42 -0400
with message-id <E14n3Go-0004jb-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#91765: fixed in c2050 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2001 13:00:25 +0000
>From mnencia@centerweb.it Mon Mar 26 07:00:25 2001
Return-path: <mnencia@centerweb.it>
Received: from faramir.centerweb.it [193.70.7.133] (qmailr)
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14hWbh-0001yx-00; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:00:25 -0600
Received: (qmail 2723 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2001 13:00:22 -0000
Received: from dup-9-5200.centerweb.it (HELO timelord) (mail@193.70.7.169)
  by faramir.centerweb.it with SMTP; 26 Mar 2001 13:00:21 -0000
Received: from mnencia by timelord with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14hWdK-0000K5-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:02:06 +0200
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:02:06 +0200
From: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@prato.linux.it>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: c2050 -- Driver for Lexmark 2050 Series printers
Message-ID: <20010326150206.A1206@timelord>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
X-Sublimal-Message: Support free software!
Sender: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@centerweb.it>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

I intend to package c2050.

Package: c2050
License: GPL
URL: http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia/lexmark2050/

c2050 is a Driver per converting a Postscript file to Lexmark 2050 format.
I am the author of this software.

--=20
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|     Marco Nenciarini     | Debian/GNU Linux User - Plug Member   |
|  mnencia@prato.linux.it  | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint =3D FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95  5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4


--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6vz3OaGRzDfCV5eQRAudzAJ0blpJt0jgpTOaMxkWwnuV2iS+PyQCdFrKw
H+BBFGSGUqAcAz4eTQ6czFQ=
=yKlW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 91765-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2001 19:26:09 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Tue Apr 10 14:26:09 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14n3mC-0008Qr-00; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:26:09 -0500
Received: (qmail 19396 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2001 19:21:17 -0000
Received: from auric.debian.org (mail@206.246.226.45)
  by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 10 Apr 2001 19:21:17 -0000
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14n3Go-0004jb-00; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:53:42 -0400
From: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@prato.linux.it>
To: 91765-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.36 $
Subject: Bug#91765: fixed in c2050 0.3-1
Message-Id: <E14n3Go-0004jb-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:53:42 -0400
Delivered-To: 91765-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
c2050, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

c2050_0.3-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/c2050/c2050_0.3-1.diff.gz
c2050_0.3-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/c2050/c2050_0.3-1_i386.deb
c2050_0.3-1.dsc
  to pool/main/c/c2050/c2050_0.3-1.dsc
c2050_0.3.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/c2050/c2050_0.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 91765@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@prato.linux.it> (supplier of updated c2050 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  9 Mar 2001 20:08:29 +0100
Source: c2050
Binary: c2050
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@prato.linux.it>
Changed-By: Marco Nenciarini <mnencia@prato.linux.it>
Description: 
 c2050      - Lexmark 2050 Color Jetprinter Linux Driver
Closes: 91765
Changes: 
 c2050 (0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release. (Closes: #91765)
Files: 
 5ffc63f57e5bf2464a9870d21febc145 597 admin optional c2050_0.3-1.dsc
 d6bc88ede5887c6e2fd8829c23b255fa 12331 admin optional c2050_0.3.orig.tar.gz
 1752ee1077996feff2af010295360b2a 2785 admin optional c2050_0.3-1.diff.gz
 e5d0a29b84914440d3db2a9ca61d0fc3 8894 admin optional c2050_0.3-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ygwpmfzqmE8StAARArH9AKCj+Q3mLMGrVgpwfGrDGDhcbNCkzQCeMGSr
gp8FSUj6uv3WfpyUU9zXYtU=
=UZZc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: