Bug#84766: marked as done (RFA: ncftp2 -- A user-friendly and full-featured FTP client.)
Your message dated Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:23:16 +0000
with message-id <20010407072316.A6835@deneb>
and subject line Bug#84766
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2001 03:54:00 +0000
>From quango@watervalley.net Sat Feb 03 21:54:00 2001
Return-path: <quango@watervalley.net>
Received: from mail.watervalley.net (watervalley.net) [::ffff:216.220.140.3]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14PGFT-0005vm-00; Sat, 03 Feb 2001 21:54:00 -0600
Received: from [216.220.142.61] (HELO quantex) by watervalley.net (Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b8) with ESMTP id S.0013610688; Sat, 03 Feb 2001 21:54:09 -0600
Received: by quantex (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B9D562F88; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:53:55 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Lawrence <lawrencc@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: ncftp2 -- A user-friendly and full-featured FTP client.
X-Reportbug-Version: ##VERSION##
X-Mailer: reportbug ##VERSION##
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 21:53:55 -0600
Message-Id: <20010204035355.B9D562F88@quantex>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-02-03
Severity: normal
I'd like to give up ncftp2. I really don't use it that much, and it
isn't maintained upstream anymore. It has a few outstanding bugs,
including some issues with SOCKS support and weird behavior in
exceptional conditions (low disk space).
I'd prefer if someone who uses SOCKS would take it over, since that's
where the most annoying bugs seem to be (and I can't get the
submitters of those reports to tell me if the runsocks program solves
the problem ;-). Otherwise, it's lintian clean and builds, so it
might not be a bad project for someone in the NM queue. And I'd be
willing to sponsor uploads for someone in that queue.
(this report was also produced as a test of reportbug's upcoming wnpp
handholding support, but that's a side issue ;-)
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux quango4 2.4.0 #1 Sun Jan 21 20:00:16 CST 2001 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 84766-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2001 07:10:39 +0000
>From muhammad_yusuf@lineone.net Sat Apr 07 02:10:39 2001
Return-path: <muhammad_yusuf@lineone.net>
Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lmrm-00073K-00; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 02:10:38 -0500
Received: from [213.122.220.245] (helo=odyssey)
by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #83)
id 14lmrl-0000Tw-00
for 84766-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 08:10:37 +0100
Received: from hussain by odyssey with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14ln40-0001mQ-00
for <84766-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 07 Apr 2001 07:23:16 +0000
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 07:23:16 +0000
To: 84766-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#84766
Message-ID: <20010407072316.A6835@deneb>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Muhammad Hussain Yusuf <muhammad_yusuf@lineone.net>
Delivered-To: 84766-done@bugs.debian.org
New version uploaded by new maintainer.
Reply to: