Bug#92353: marked as done (ITA: pam -- Pluggable Authentication Modules)
Your message dated Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:08:57 -0400
with message-id <E14lF7p-0007Pk-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#92353: fixed in pam 0.72-19
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2001 21:57:56 +0000
>From bmc@visi.net Sat Mar 31 15:57:56 2001
Return-path: <bmc@visi.net>
Received: from ppp26.ts4-2.newportnews.visi.net (blimpo.internal.net) [209.8.198.218]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14jTNb-0002fK-00; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 15:57:56 -0600
Received: from bmc by blimpo.internal.net with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14jTNY-0004ao-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:57:52 -0500
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:57:52 -0500
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: pam -- Pluggable Authentication Modules
Message-ID: <20010331165752.Q16057@visi.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
Sender: Ben Collins <bmc@visi.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
These are the modules used for authentication. They are used by programs
such as login, passwd, sshd, ftpd, etc.
Do not take on this package unless you have a good deal of knowledge
about this library.
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` bcollins@debian.org -- bcollins@openldap.org -- bcollins@linux.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 92353-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2001 19:52:49 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Thu Apr 05 14:52:49 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [216.234.231.6]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lFoG-0008Kv-00; Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:52:49 -0500
Received: (qmail 28685 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2001 19:52:29 -0000
Received: from auric.debian.org (206.246.226.45)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2001 19:52:29 -0000
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14lF7p-0007Pk-00; Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:08:57 -0400
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
To: 92353-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.36 $
Subject: Bug#92353: fixed in pam 0.72-19
Message-Id: <E14lF7p-0007Pk-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 15:08:57 -0400
Delivered-To: 92353-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pam, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libpam0g-dev_0.72-19_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam0g-dev_0.72-19_i386.deb
libpam-cracklib_0.72-19_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam-cracklib_0.72-19_i386.deb
libpam-modules_0.72-19_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam-modules_0.72-19_i386.deb
libpam-runtime_0.72-19_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam-runtime_0.72-19_i386.deb
pam_0.72-19.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/pam/pam_0.72-19.diff.gz
libpam-doc_0.72-19_all.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam-doc_0.72-19_all.deb
pam_0.72-19.dsc
to pool/main/p/pam/pam_0.72-19.dsc
libpam0g_0.72-19_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pam/libpam0g_0.72-19_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 92353@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> (supplier of updated pam package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 21:32:17 -0400
Source: pam
Binary: libpam-runtime libpam-modules libpam-cracklib libpam0g-dev libpam-doc libpam0g
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.72-19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Description:
libpam-cracklib - PAM module to enable cracklib support.
libpam-doc - Documentation of PAM
libpam-modules - Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM
libpam-runtime - Runtime support for the PAM library
libpam0g - Pluggable Authentication Modules library
libpam0g-dev - Development files for PAM
Closes: 92353
Changes:
pam (0.72-19) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer, closes: #92353
* Install pam-undocumented; somehow it was not installed in -18
Files:
c82221d44216008584c4cac1eabd29fb 784 base optional pam_0.72-19.dsc
419de448cb77e24ccf09ccbefa1bb969 66756 base optional pam_0.72-19.diff.gz
d697b10c91bce04268a9d8a66e7e9cff 599604 doc optional libpam-doc_0.72-19_all.deb
d822836dcc644a10f82b92a338c78ecb 61686 base required libpam0g_0.72-19_i386.deb
294950e13de3db1e2b278f4efa33bb5e 131410 base required libpam-modules_0.72-19_i386.deb
6cbcd6994727b9b135e9056b9294ee29 40568 base required libpam-runtime_0.72-19_i386.deb
5df083eb70cfa4e01d7ba230bbaf96ff 151050 devel optional libpam0g-dev_0.72-19_i386.deb
b2af6de50eee700f0e6804eb2c849cf9 42422 libs optional libpam-cracklib_0.72-19_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjrL5NsACgkQ/I12czyGJg/rnACg57wxdwCxUN1qvAlMnFh2Jams
GCAAn3MNCCxRetuvoDzSmlbpbwYqTrQO
=PSx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: