On 31-Mar-2001 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andy Mortimer <andy.mortimer@zetnet.co.uk> [20010315 20:42]:
>> > How about removing it now?
>>
>> Why? This way, at least it gives people a chance to object! If you
>> can think of a good reason to do so, feel free to pass it on.
>
> The package has a Standards-Version of 2.4.0 which in itself would be
> a serious bug. Also, there are a couple of lintian errors:
>
> E: dpkg-mountable: cron-script-not-marked-as-conffile
> etc/cron.weekly/dpkg-mountable
> E: dpkg-mountable: binary-without-manpage updated-packages
> E: dpkg-mountable: copyright-refers-to-old-directory
> W: dpkg-mountable: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
All easy to fix, IMO. The first 3 errors at least, seem kinda easy to fix.
Perhaps the 4th is too, I just never ran into it before.
--
Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523
pub 1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola <claviola@ajato.com.br>
Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372
I have a solar vocal ail!
Attachment:
pgpT1Q2sVHgX2.pgp
Description: PGP signature