[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#88567: marked as done (ITP: scanssh - scan addresses and networks for sshd and report versions)



Your message dated Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:04:59 -0500
with message-id <E14guHT-0003cH-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#88567: fixed in scanssh 1.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Mar 2001 04:50:54 +0000
>From rene_reply_0103_8931@elvenlord.com Sun Mar 04 22:50:54 2001
Return-path: <rene_reply_0103_8931@elvenlord.com>
Received: from cr589119-a.wlfdle1.on.wave.home.com (satori.bauhaus) [::ffff:24.114.52.184] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14ZmxS-0003X2-00; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 22:50:54 -0600
Received: from rweber by satori.bauhaus with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14ZmxQ-0002la-00; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 23:50:52 -0500
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 23:50:51 -0500
From: Rene Weber <rene_deblist@elvenlord.com>
To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: scanssh - scan addresses and networks for sshd and report versions
Message-ID: <20010304235051.A10602@bauhaus.dhs.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Uptime: This computer has been up 184 days,  1:45.  Can your Windows do this?
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Sender: Rene <rene_reply_0103_8931@elvenlord.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org


--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

=46rom the readme:
Scanssh scans the given addresses and networks for running SSH
servers.  It will query their version number and displays the results
in a list.

This program was originally written under OpenBSD as a personal
measurement tool.  However, besides gathering statistics, it's also
useful for other purposes such as ensuring that all machines on your
network run the latest SSH versions, etc...

License: BSD
URL: <http://www.monkey.org/~provos/scanssh/>

----

[Cc'ed to debian-devel because of earlier discussion and because of
questions I pose below.]

NOTES:

- A test version of the package is available at
  <http://people.debian.org/~rweber/prelim/>.  Please note that it is a TEST
  package and the version will not be incremented for the final release.
  (The only non-potato box I have is a chroot, so this is barely tested
  yet.)

- Upstream agreed with me that the semantics of the -E option (whether to
  exit if the exclude file is not specified/found) should change, and
  supplied me a patch from the CVS.  I want to avoid changing this option
  between releases, but this makes my package inconsistent with the
  published version.  It *is* documented as the new usage, but does anyone
  think that this is a particularly bad idea?

- License is BSD, except that it diffs with the license in
  /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD:

----------------------------  C U T   H E R E  ----------------------------

diff bsd /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD=20
0a1
> Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California.
11,12c12,14
< 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
<    derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
---
> 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors
>    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software
>    without specific prior written permission.
14c16
< THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR ``AS IS'' AND
---
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
17c19
< ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE
---
> ARE DISCLAIMED.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE

----------------------------  C U T   H E R E  ----------------------------

    I must assume this is ok, but since it does differ, do I need to go to
debian-legal to be sure?  I don't need to include the full license, do I?

Rene Weber

--=20
+---           (Rene Weber is <rene_autoreply@elvenlord.com>)          ---+
|  To err is human; to really screw things up requires the root password  |
|  or access to the power switch.                                         |
+---  E-Mail Policy & web page: <http://satori.home.dhs.org/~rweber/>  ---+

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6oxsrzPDVN58iNoMRAgTgAJ9h3QrR9qtjLgapGEIB4LpyTYXmBwCcDmRU
W71csphj541Z/Bby1U/LgZ0=
=623l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 88567-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2001 20:05:39 +0000
>From troup@auric.debian.org Sat Mar 24 14:05:39 2001
Return-path: <troup@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14guI7-0005qr-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 14:05:39 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14guHT-0003cH-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:04:59 -0500
From: Rene Weber <rene_debmaint@elvenlord.com>
To: 88567-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.35 $
Subject: Bug#88567: fixed in scanssh 1.5-1
Message-Id: <E14guHT-0003cH-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: James Troup <troup@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 15:04:59 -0500
Delivered-To: 88567-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
scanssh, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

scanssh_1.5-1.dsc
  to pool/main/s/scanssh/scanssh_1.5-1.dsc
scanssh_1.5-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/scanssh/scanssh_1.5-1_i386.deb
scanssh_1.5-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/scanssh/scanssh_1.5-1.diff.gz
scanssh_1.5.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/s/scanssh/scanssh_1.5.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 88567@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Weber <rene_debmaint@elvenlord.com> (supplier of updated scanssh package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:19:44 -0500
Source: scanssh
Binary: scanssh
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Weber <rene_debmaint@elvenlord.com>
Changed-By: Rene Weber <rene_debmaint@elvenlord.com>
Description: 
 scanssh    - get SSH server versions for an entire network
Closes: 88567
Changes: 
 scanssh (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release.  (closes: #88567)
   * Incremented maximum hosts to 65536 (from 64000) and documented the
     limitation (previously undocumented).
   * Added documentation of version number to man page and executeable.
Files: 
 90e5805c3af07c0d49f8cb8a53405f44 630 net optional scanssh_1.5-1.dsc
 b7d7951cc31d7d1d5c389c4c1b20e74b 49356 net optional scanssh_1.5.orig.tar.gz
 b611aa547a8b7550ad4ec2ff62e8634c 3488 net optional scanssh_1.5-1.diff.gz
 7c4c384285c98c34dd8ce084bc635211 17672 net optional scanssh_1.5-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6uVjKzPDVN58iNoMRAvAFAKCahe3+QlyEeZe2yazIwbNptmfSAACeLBBZ
z0cpjjYLMCNgUzGdOD/AU2Y=
=5CHw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: