[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#88163: acknowledged by developer (Bug#88163: fix



On 18-Mar-2001 Karl Pauls wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> 
>> I don't understand, do you have some problem with xdiskusage? The bug I
>> closed
>> was the ITP (intent to package). What is your problem with xdiskusage?
> 
> Oh yet, sorry I forgot to add a full description of the "little bug" I
> mentioned in my ITP

You didn't do an ITP. You did an RFP, that's different. (a RFP is a request
that someone package a program you found out to be useful; an ITP is to show
everybody your intention to package a program)

> xdiskusage takes the output of du and processes that correct? The version of
> du I have ends its output with this:
> 
> 
> 225124  ./home/andross
> 24      ./home/sleeze
> 241388  ./home
> 4       ./mnt/e
> 4       ./mnt/smb
> 4       ./mnt/loop
> 4       ./mnt/liz
> 20      ./mnt
> 4       ./floppy
> 4       ./cdrom
> 4       ./initrd
> 4       ./dvd
> 4       ./cdr
> 1944432 .
> 
> 
> If xdiskusage incorrectly interperets the last entry to be "/" instead of ""
> (nothing) and computes it as part of the subdirectories. This problem
> persists
> when listing all files.
> 
> I believe this causes the size of the used space to be twice what it should
> be! This may also cause my second problem: when descending from the root
> directory on my "one big filesystem" installation (i.e. no /home /usr or any
> other partitions except old windoze ones) the program segaults and
> terminates.
> If xdiskusage uses the output of df to determine the disk capacity then the
> error might stem from the fact that the used space seems to be greater than
> the disk capacity!
> 
> I have taken a screen shot of the first problem. You may view it here:
> http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~kpauls/xdiskusage.jpg
> 
> Note it still reports some free space, which clashes with my theory...
> 
> Thanks for packaging xdiskusage! I probably wouldn't have been able to have
> done a good job since it would have been my first.

Again, I'm sorry if it was your intention to package xdiskusage yourself. Since
you filed an RFP, ... I became interested in xdiskusage and ITP'd it. Better
make sure you tag your bugs properly next time.

By the way, please file this bug under xdiskusage itself, as bug #88163
concerns the ITP only (it's filed against wnpp). I've seen the bug is real, so
please file it.

Thanks,
Carlos

-- 
Carlos Laviola - ICQ 55799523
pub  1024D/3516D372 2000-06-05 Carlos Laviola <claviola@ajato.com.br>
     Key fingerprint = 3BE1 6591 C78C 2AA4 31DD  AEEF 6406 0227 3516 D372

Attachment: pgpkk8yDT05pn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: