Hi, Quoting Helmut Grohne (2026-04-15 14:57:48) > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 01:08:20PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues > wrote: > > I do not see what change in sbuild would be required. As you pointed out, you > > can already pass it the timestamp. What else would be needed? There is also > > --binNMU-changelog which can be passed to completely control the changelog > > entry without sbuild messing up anything. > > The sbuild source package also builds the buildd binary package. It > contains the code that adds --binNMU-changelog and I argue that it > should also be adding the --binNMU-timestamp flag. See > lib/Buildd/Daemon.pm. This is pending an agreement with the wanna-build team > of how wanna-build communicates such a timestamp. ah okay. I do not consider myself responsible for the buildd scripts and libs and according to "git log bin/buildd* lib/Buildd/" I have only ever touched them five times in my 11 years of sbuild involvment. I consider the responsibility for the buildd scripts 100% on the wb-team and when they want/need to change something, at least as far as I am concerned, they can just perform whatever change they want and upload it. Maybe Jochen wants to have a say but from my side, the wb-team can just do whatever they need with that part of sbuild. Thank you for your work! Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature