[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Priority of buildd-unstable?


with buildd-unstable available, I can schedule Haskell binNMUs much
faster, which is good. But I’m starting to worry that the builds would
still use packages from unstable, even though there is a newer (but not
yet installable) version in buildd-unstable. It’s hard to check
directly, because of the volatile nature of these repos... so here is my

If a package pkg is available in both unstable and buildd-unstable, will
the builders consider installing the former?

If yes, could this be changed, i.e. using a proper apt pinning value?


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: