Hi, with buildd-unstable available, I can schedule Haskell binNMUs much faster, which is good. But I’m starting to worry that the builds would still use packages from unstable, even though there is a newer (but not yet installable) version in buildd-unstable. It’s hard to check directly, because of the volatile nature of these repos... so here is my question: If a package pkg is available in both unstable and buildd-unstable, will the builders consider installing the former? If yes, could this be changed, i.e. using a proper apt pinning value? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part