On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 11:55:09PM +0200, David Prévot wrote: > > agreed, i'm very very sure there won't be any consensus about LLM usage > > no matter how we'll vote. > NOTA (Non Of The Above) should already convey part of the statement that no > consensus has been reached (or sought). Would a plea to No Further > Discussion help (I don’t think so anymore, so much has already been imposed > to all of us, asking for less may not reach the target)? while one of our (old) mottos is 'rough consensus and running code' I don't think we (need|can achieve) consensus here (on the topic of LLM/AI), not even rough one. but that per se is not bad, there are many topics where we don't have consensus. and that's very fine. you love emacs and i dont. yay. and there are also some important topics, where we have consensus. yay! (those are (part of) the basis of Debian.) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ "I like beautiful people. I don't care about their looks."
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature