Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
From: Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 01:35:21 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 64716bb3-8ab1-4ea9-82a6-7dc03cad2e9b@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] anUTO7SQXgYcpa4t@localhost>
References: <amPL_Y5C0BJkI_47@roeckx.be> <[🔎] 5277ed64-7bab-4fbb-b4fd-a1ddb7e0c35e@disroot.org> <[🔎] anTiVsTek52dCzTT@roeckx.be> <[🔎] anTy6Cl6Pl_vVCD0@roeckx.be> <[🔎] anUTO7SQXgYcpa4t@localhost>

On 2026/08/07 01:05, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Did the DPL only change the minimum discussion period and not the
maximum discussion period?

It would be good to get that clarified, since it is not clear to me
from the DPL email what exactly was intended to be changed.

To recap: The DPL requested an extension of 7 days, and the secretaryextended the discussion period to the 13th of August.


-Jonathan

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
  - From: Clint Adams <clint@debian.org>

References:
- Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
  - From: Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org>
- Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
  - From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
Next by Date: Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
Next by thread: Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread