Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 10:11, Gard Spreemann <gspr@nonempty.org> wrote: > > Is this really what we're discussing though? I can see why one would > want an AI policy not to bar on copyright grounds something that is not > copyrightable in the first place. That's reasonable. But I don't think > it's what people really mean when they're concerned about > copyright. > > The wording of the proposals bans *all* contributions where AI is used in their creation, > without any regard to the copyrightability of the contribution itself. > > So that is why the argument is proposed, that if teh copyright *is* the key concern, then the > policy should not apply to contrubitions small enough not to be considered as copyrightable > and do so explicitly. I should have made it clear that I see and appreciate that concern. If there was interest in my ballot proposal, I would have worked to change the wording accordingly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature