[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data



At 2025-05-07T18:10:37+0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> My reading is that if it is possible for a skilled person to re-create
> an equivalent model following some description, under Aigars'
> proposal, it would be permissible to have gnipgnop-rattrap in Debian
> main, including the model trained on 75 gigabytes of Disney films.
> 
> That is not my preference nor what I would want to see happen, but I
> think it is consistent with how Debian approach including non-free
> firmware in the official installer images, and how Debian approaches
> licensing on other non-source files inside packages.

An alternative to surrendering to the preferences of self-styled
"pragmatists" who would prefer the Debian distribution to reflect the
priorities of a commercial OS vendor is to fight for (argue for,
advocate) what you believe in.

Do so in full awareness that you may lose the battle.  Only the
privileged few can expect to prevail in every contest.  They play on a
tilted table and cite their score cards as evidence of personal merit.

Regards,
Branden

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: