Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org> writes: > Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on (AI) Models I'll second this option. I think it describes an internally consistent policy and give clear practical recommendations. > 2 Models are not suitable for the non-free-firmware archive. I think this will be difficult to enforce. We have no idea what's in the non-free-firmware blobs, nor is there any reliable way for us to ever gain that, and it seems likely that LLM models will end up inside non-free firmware blobs if they haven't already. How about removing that paragraph and replace 'non-free' with 'non-free(-firmware)' in the rest of your proposal? /Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature