Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 22:10:28 -0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] vve1ci$8ttn$1@posted-at.bofh.it>
References: <[🔎] tslecx2dcr4.fsf@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] 00e0aaaedf5c050a7b09b53c880aecbf9b9220b0.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] tslzffqbwrb.fsf@suchdamage.org> <[🔎] 878qnaiwvd.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 20250506115857.mr44k5tqywisx75h@upsilon.cc> <[🔎] aBoegK0AYm6i3wMd@remnant.pseudorandom.co.uk>

smcv@debian.org wrote:

>Debian is unusual in the way we interpret our mission statement as 
>extending to everything we distribute being Free, not just our 
>executable code. Many other FOSS distributions apply the DFSG, the OSD,
>the FSF's guidelines or similar principles to executable code (only), 
>and do not see a problem with having non-executable data that Debian 
>would consider to be non-Free.
I have been a Debian developer for almost 30 years, and I remember that
when I joined the project we had no plans to apply the DFSG to e.g.
documentation.
Then the "editorial changes" (not) GR happened, and some people were
very surprised by the practical outcome.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

References:
- Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Ansgar 🙀 <ansgar@debian.org>
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Next by Date: Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Previous by thread: Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Next by thread: Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread