Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data

[Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>]

On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 05:12:12PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > FWIW, in terms of free software ethics, I consider non-open data to be
> > > "less nasty" than non-free code.
> >
> > Debian is unusual in the way we interpret our mission statement as
> > extending to everything we distribute being Free, not just our
> > executable code.
>
> I don't think Debian is perfectly consistent in applying that principle:
> for example, the text of the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) is
> included in Debian packages (in 'main') and has a clearly non-free
> license, and IIRC sometimes not even in debian/copyright. 

Same for the text of GPL.

> There are
> other examples historically of similar content too, e.g., IETF RFCs

These are usually considered bugs.


--
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature