[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data



On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 05:12:12PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
FWIW, in terms of free software ethics, I consider non-open data to be
"less nasty" than non-free code.

Debian is unusual in the way we interpret our mission statement as
extending to everything we distribute being Free, not just our
executable code.

I don't think Debian is perfectly consistent in applying that principle:
for example, the text of the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) is
included in Debian packages (in 'main') and has a clearly non-free
license, and IIRC sometimes not even in debian/copyright.

Same for the text of GPL.

There are
other examples historically of similar content too, e.g., IETF RFCs

These are usually considered bugs.


--
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: