Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
>>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
Stefano> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:13:58PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> However, I am very leery about extending that exception to cases
>> where people are intentionally creating that situation by
>> deleting the input data on purpose.
Stefano> I agree with you on this.
FWIW, I also agree. I let the rules lawyer side of me get ahead of
everything else.
I am collecting my thoughts and will put them together into a summary
with my thinking updated based on Russ's input and Ansgar's input after
I come up with some concise to say.
I just wanted to respond to this point because in retrospect the
position I took yesterday on intentionally deleting training data was
not well-considered.
Reply to: