[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal A Amendament (was: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models



>>>>> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> writes:

    Gunnar> M. Zhou dijo [Mon, May 05, 2025 at 03:41:14PM -0400]:
    >> The issue is also discussed here:
    >> https://lwn.net/Articles/1019028/
    >> 
    >> A better wording goes: s/open source license/DFSG-compatible
    >> license/g
    >> 
    >> It is fixed in the git repo:
    >> https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/commit/9496f9fb6405db5a99fff1672cd4bad66c925c24
    >> 
    >> The proposal after amendament:
    >> 
    >> ===============================================================================
    >> Proposal A: "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license
    >> license without original training data or program" are not seen
    >> as DFSG-compliant.
    >> ===============================================================================
    >> 
    >> The "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license
    >> without original training data or program", a particular type of
    >> files as explained above, are not seen as DFSG-compliant. Hence,
    >> they can not be included in the "main" section of the Debian
    >> archive. This proposal does not specify whether the "non-free"
    >> section of Debian archive can include those files.

The amended wording addresses the issue I raised; thanks.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: