Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Le Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 01:56:17PM -0400, M. Zhou a écrit :
> ===============================================================================
> Proposal A: "AI models released under open source license without original
> training data or program" are not seen as DFSG-compliant.
> ===============================================================================
>
> The "AI models released under open source license without original training
> data or program", a particular type of files as explained above, are not seen
> as DFSG-compliant. Hence, they can not be included in the "main" section of the
> Debian archive. This proposal does not specify whether the "non-free" section
> of Debian archive can include those files.
Could we avoid using the term 'Artificial intelligence' in the text of
the proposal (not in the appendix)? This term dates for 1970 and has had
different meaning for eachdecades since then. In ten years it is likely
that, while the question this GR addresses will still be relevant, the
term 'Artificial intelligence' will refer to something quite different.
Wikipedia includes this citation:
"" However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting
edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being
called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough
it's not labeled AI anymore."[2][3] ""
<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artificial_intelligence&oldid=1286364868>
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: