[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models



On 22.04.25 22:59, Ansgar 🙀 wrote:
But the practical effects of passing the GR is probably (among other
things):

a) Removal of OCR software (like tesseract[1])
b) Removal of image recognition software (like opencv[2])
c) Possibly removal of text-to-speech software (like festival[3] or
flite[4])

You might want to write a counter-proposal B, then.

Or even a proposal C that's more nuanced.

I mean, with the right prompt you can get many AI models to regurgitate some of the texts or images they've been trained with. TTBOMK it's mostly-impossible to do that with Tesseract or OpenCV.

NB, do we really need to *remove* these packages? or maybe just move them to contrib, and their model files to non-free?

-- 
-- regards
-- 
-- Matthias Urlichs
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:4.0
N:Urlichs;Matthias;;;
NICKNAME:Smurf
EMAIL;PREF=1:matthias@urlichs.de
TEL;TYPE=work;VALUE=TEXT:+49 911 59818 0
URL;TYPE=home:https://matthias.urlichs.de
END:VCARD

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: