[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: call for seconds - separate proposal text for 2023/vote_002



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello all,

El Wed, 22 Nov 2023 19:16:48 +0100
Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> escribió:
> Hello, I hereby welcome seconds for adding this text to 2023/vote_002
> as a separate proposal.
> 
> START OF PROPOSAL TEXT
> 
> Debian Public Statement about the EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and
> the Product Liability Directive (PLD)
> 
> The CRA includes requirements for manufacturers of software, followed
> up by the PLD with compulsory liability for software. The Debian
> project has concerns on the impact on Free and Open-Source Software
> (FOSS).
> 
> The CRA makes the use of FOSS in commercial context more difficult.
> This goes against the philosophy of the Debian project. The Debian
> Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) include "6. No Discrimination Against
> Fields of Endeavor - The license must not restrict anyone from making
> use of the program in a specific field of endeavor." A significant
> part of the success of FOSS is its use in commercial context. It
> should remain possible for anyone to produce, publish and use FOSS,
> without making it harder for commercial entities or for any group of
> FOSS users.
> 
> The compulsory liability as meant in the PLD overrules the usual
> liability disclaimers in FOSS licenses. This makes sharing FOSS with
> the public more legally risky. The compulsory liability makes sense
> for closed-source software, where the users fully depend on the
> manufacturers. With FOSS the users have the option of helping
> themselves with the source code, and/or hiring any consultant on the
> market. The usual liability disclaimers in FOSS licenses should remain
> valid without the risk of being overruled by the PLD.
> 
> The Debian project asks the EU to not draw a line between commercial
> and non-commercial use of FOSS. Such line should instead be between
> closed-source software and FOSS. FOSS should be entirely exempt from
> the CRA and the PLD.
> 
> END OF PROPOSAL TEXT
> 

Seconded.

Kind regards,
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEZin0RNRxg3W3fj8cTDhhvcxwa3QFAmVffFcACgkQTDhhvcxw
a3R0TAv/abNEOcO8skEQSyrj0EXJkyYtOQlpHd+22ZDEbu4ebMH4naC4tkF1IKKO
rEQR4DyTUGnY5VdHn1BePX6/vTred7o/NoFkAjDTm0oU88Xdj1/P/M8e4pDhRoWy
wh/Z5MxEy7x06C2YipDkyBPark8+VwapLzQD5Z2QtX1N3ZlwdbkOgbLpxA0grpEc
dzQEZm7IOgSRSCre56F7lHqvzoLfLhmwYjJHCOfmWyc91FcIqXwG1/UWXMywZAPk
od4ESfCzlDiow2+PSXP3J9VVtlNXzyz7seBmswK8CN3NrGJAEP/2/MnpMxyBvLLp
DM7l3MYugoiCiMNk1yBP7972lZnJRD/u+2jiZBRUYQyJxHgA0uAYO+IR+DavoE3y
++7qErWH6CKzLsOqAC69j4FlUE5w0RAu7bCDTlowGLjbDkq2q3xX/Qn9GU/XZCIm
8gdtMThSZZSZ2C6zYm+wQDsZZV46aM7A7tfxEOUjjn4LSRifURKFZ5ME0qe/ZxcM
FTWauMeA
=s2Fs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: