Kurt Roeckx wrote: > As you indicate yourself, this is an interpretation of the SC. I would > really prefer that such a question was not open to interpretation and > that the SC was changed to make it more clear what we mean. Is it possible that we can risk 3:1 supermajority and change SC so that we allow distributions of non-free software as an official image? Like changing §1 so that "Debian will remain free by default" and explicitly claiming that in order to support basic function of the user hardware we provide distributable firmware in our (firmware-non-free) repository and installation media. We could also explicitly claiming that such repository is part of Debian to have a proper ground. If we are heading towards the direction, could we ask for an extension of the discussion period in order to come up with a reasonable changes? Yao Wei
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature